GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Social Protection Pathways: Shaping Social Justice Outcomes for the Most Marginalised, Now and Post-2015

Social Protection Pathways: Shaping Social Justice Outcomes for the Most Marginalised, Now and Post-2015

Library
Nicola Jones, Thea Shahrokh
2013

Summary

Social injustice arises from structural inequalities which lead to unequal capabilities and outcomes for excluded and marginalised groups. There is a growing consensus that social justice requires addressing not just income deficits but also structural vulnerabilities and power hierarchies. This Background Note develops a conceptual framework at a number of scales from structural sources of risk to individual experiences of vulnerability. It highlights that in order to tackle multidimensional vulnerability in a sustainable way, social protection programmes need to be designed and governed so as to promote social inclusion and accountability.

To date, social protection programming has largely been a response to shocks and chronic income poverty, but proponents of a social exclusion perspective are increasingly targeting structural inequalities and lifecycle vulnerabilities. This note identifies a number of structural factors which influence the effectiveness of social protection programmes, including the availability of monetary resources, labour market structure, the role of family, state, and private sector in care provision, and local and international laws and norms. The note also discusses constraints on social protection programming from a political economy perspective, recognising that economic constraints are often themselves the outcome of political processes.

The note advocates further research to develop models of good practice for social protection programmes that are responsive to social exclusion. Particularly required are in-depth vulnerability assessments, mixed-methods approaches, in-depth qualitative evidence, a political economy perspective, and work which emphasises principles of citizenship, rights, and empowerment.

Source

Jones, N., & Shahrokh, T. (2013). Social protection pathways: shaping social justice outcomes for the most marginalised, now and post-2015. London: ODI.

Related Content

Affirmative action around the world Insights from a new dataset (update)
Working Papers
2023
Pathways to Increase Rural Women’s Agency Within Social Protection Programmes
Helpdesk Report
2023
Increasing Birth Registration for Children of Marginalised Groups in Pakistan
Helpdesk Report
2021
Role of Faith and Belief in Environmental Engagement and Action in MENA Region
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".