GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Somalia and Somaliland: Envisioning a dialogue on the question of Somali unity

Somalia and Somaliland: Envisioning a dialogue on the question of Somali unity

Library
Matt Bryden
2004

Summary

What obstacles and challenges will negotiations between an interim Somali government and the Republic of Somaliland face? What are the likely scenarios for a dialogue on Somali unity? This article from African Security Review examines the issues likely to be involved in negotiations on Somali unity. It argues that while such a dialogue will be challenging and risky, the most probable alternative is the emergence of an intractable conflict. The international community should therefore discard its “wait-and-see” attitude in favour of active preventive diplomacy.

Arguably the most difficult problem facing a transitional Somali government will be the unity of the Somali Republic. The Republic of Somaliland (northwest Somalia) declared its independence in 1991 and a significant majority of Somalilanders now support independent statehood. The Republic of Somaliland has yet to gain international recognition, however, and the vast majority of southern Somalis oppose Somaliland’s independence. Somaliland’s political leaders have long argued that they are prepared to enter into dialogue with a southern Somali government. The formation of a Somali government could therefore be followed by dialogue with Somaliland, leading either to a mutually acceptable association or an amicable divorce.

The notion of dialogue between a transitional Somali government and Somaliland offers an attractive and superficially plausible method of addressing the issue of Somali unity. In practice, it is likely to prove a complex proposition that could easily exacerbate tensions rather than mitigate them:

  • Both sides will have to confront strong domestic opposition to any dialogue, while the status of the parties in negotiations will also represent an obstacle. Both sides will seek to set the agenda for dialogue in support of their mutually exclusive positions.
  • In negotiating an association, Somaliland will expect significant concessions in return for sacrificing outright independence. Southern leaders, however, will fear that such concessions could upset power-sharing arrangements in the south.
  • A negotiated association will require effective integration of the two territories. Differences in levels of political and economic development will make their amalgamation a formidable challenge.
  • Negotiating a separation is likely to be just as difficult as negotiating unity. Somaliland will not want to allow the southern government a veto on its independence. Both sides are likely to disagree over the terms of a referendum.
  • International recognition of an interim Somali government will implicitly favour Somali unity, making the prospects for a peaceful, negotiated settlement more difficult.
The challenge for the international community is to encourage the success of an interim Somali government, while mitigating the likelihood of conflict over Somaliland. Striking the right balance requires active preventive diplomacy:
  • The African Union Peace and Security Council could take the issue under formal consideration before the formation of an interim Somali government. This would justify opening communication with both sides before and during the transitional period.
  • Foreign governments and international organisations should actively engage with both parties to reinforce their commitment to a negotiated outcome.
  • A form of qualified recognition would help to level the playing field and provide an incentive for both sides to negotiate. One such form of recognition would be awarding both parties observer status in various international organisations.
  • The African Union and the United Nations could establish procedures for monitoring progress during the transitional period that would include resolution of the unity issue.

Source

Bryden M., 2004, 'Somalia and Somaliland: Envisioning a dialogue on the question of Somali unity', Vol. 13, No. 2, African Security Review

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Who are the Elite Groups in Iraq and How do they Exercise Power
Helpdesk Report
2018
State-society relations and citizenship
Topic Guide
2016
The legitimacy of states and armed non-state actors
Topic Guide
2015

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".