GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»The Domains of Health Responsiveness: A Human Rights Analysis

The Domains of Health Responsiveness: A Human Rights Analysis

Library
L Gostin
2003

Summary

What do human rights have in common with the responsiveness of healthcare systems? This report, by the World Health Organisation (WHO), argues that the improvement of health is the main goal of health systems. It outlines eight domains of healthcare responsiveness and sets out how they can be understood through human rights principles, and in the context of international human rights instruments.

Protecting human rights and public health are mutually re-enforcing. Good health enables people to exercise their fundamental rights. Safeguarding their human rights empowers them to lead safe and healthy lives. This ‘human rights based approach to health’, pays equal attention to process (how people’s rights are respected within the health system) as well as outcome (the goal of improving health).

“Patient responsiveness” can be understood as how health systems interact with individuals and affect their well being. The WHO has proposed that a health system’s performance on patient responsiveness should be evaluated alongside more traditional indicators like mortality, morbidity and utilisation statistics. If a health system is “responsive”, then interactions within the health system will improve the well being of the individual, irrespective of improvements to their health.

The concept of responsiveness has been operationalised in eight domains. These are:

  • Respect for the dignity of persons.
  • Autonomy to participate in health-related decisions.
  • Confidentiality.
  • Prompt attention.
  • Adequate quality of care.
  • Communication.
  • Access to social support networks.
  • Choice of health care providers.

Human rights principles bring meaning to “responsiveness” in three principal ways:

  • Synergy: human rights principles support improved health outcomes as well as respect for human rights.
  • Authority and Accountability: human rights provide a universally endorsed legal basis for responsiveness, demanding accountability among governmental and other actors.
  • Cohesion: all human rights demonstrate commonalities between various domains and help identify potential gaps.

Source

Gostin, L. et al., 2003, ‘The Domains of Health Responsiveness: A Human Rights Analysis’, Health and Human Rights Working Paper Series, No.2, World Health Organisation, Geneva

Related Content

Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs
Helpdesk Report
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Increasing Birth Registration for Children of Marginalised Groups in Pakistan
Helpdesk Report
2021
Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".