GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Multi-Hazards
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Professional development packs
    • Reports & literature reviews
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Our team
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»The impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on child nutrition: a review of evidence using a programme theory framework

The impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on child nutrition: a review of evidence using a programme theory framework

Library
Jef L. Leroy, Marie Ruel, Ellen Verhofstadt
2009

Summary

Millions of children worldwide, particularly in low and middle income countries, suffer from nutritional deficiencies affecting their survival, health, development, and well-being. Targeted nutrition interventions to improve this situation include breastfeeding promotion, behaviour change and communication strategies to improve complementary feeding practices, supplementation and food fortification to improve micro-nutrient status, health interventions aimed at reducing infectious diseases among infants and young children, and the effective management of severe acute malnutrition. Common to all of these strategies is the fact that they address the immediate causes of childhood undernutrition, that is, inadequate food and nutrient intake, and poor health.

The sustainability of these interventions, however, is questionable if they are implemented without simultaneously addressing the key underlying determinants of undernutrition. Childhood undernutrition is rooted in poverty, food insecurity, gender inequity, and lack of access to health and other services. The failure to address the underlying causes of malnutrition – or the global context in which malnutrition occurs – is likely to undermine the long-term impacts and sustainability of interventions focusing only on the immediate determinants of undernutrition.

The authors reviewed the evidence regarding the impact of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes on child nutrition outcomes, using a programme theory framework. They developed a programme impact model and synthesised evidence regarding the pathways through which CCTs may improve child nutrition. CCT programmes significantly improve child anthropometry but have very little impact on micronutrient status. The programmes also have a positive impact on several of the outcomes in the pathways to improved nutrition. The authors found an enormous gap in knowledge about the mechanisms by which CCT programmes improve nutrition. In order to reach their full potential, the programmes need to have a better defined set of nutrition actions grounded in programme theory.

Source

Leroy, J. L., Ruel, M. & Verhofstadt, E. (2009). The impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on child nutrition: a review of evidence using a programme theory framework. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1(2), 103-129.

Related Content

Challenges and Limitations to Entering the Workforce in Jordan for People with Disabilities
Helpdesk Report
2023
Increasing Birth Registration for Children of Marginalised Groups in Pakistan
Helpdesk Report
2021
Prevalence of health impacts related to exposure to poor air quality among children in Low and Lower Middle-Income Countries
Helpdesk Report
2020
Impact of COVID-19 on Child Labour in South Asia
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".