• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»Document Library»The Legacies of Armed Conflict

The Legacies of Armed Conflict

Library
United Nations Development Programme
2008

Summary

What are the economic legacies of armed conflict? How should policymakers approach these legacies in recovery strategies? This book chapter from the United Nations Development Programme argues that post-conflict countries are not blank slates on which new economic and social systems can be built. For a recovery strategy to work, it must acknowledge the legacies of armed conflict and consolidate those that contribute towards peace and stability.

The greatest challenge for post-conflict recovery is restoring economic foundations in ways that lessen the risk of war recurring. Analyses of what makes conflict recurrence more likely are helpful to policymakers because they indicate the requirements for post-conflict economic recovery.

The legacies of violent conflict include the widespread destruction of physical capital and infrastructure, reduced human capital, disease, displacement, capital flight, lost livelihoods, weakened institutions, reduced state capacity and diminished social capital. As a result, the country’s rate of economic growth usually declines. However, conflict often also transforms economies. The effects of conflict on economic performance include:

  • Decline in output: A recent Oxfam report estimated the loss of GDP growth suffered by African countries as a result of conflict at $18 billion annually. The pace and depth of economic contraction during post-1990 conflicts has tended to be greater than that during pre-1990 conflicts.
  • Structural changes in the economy: Frequently, much of the formal sector is destroyed and replaced by informal economic activities. These informal activities complicate economic recovery after war in several ways. Very often those who profit from these shadow economies are also the victors in the war.
  • Lost employment and livelihoods: Employment is negatively affected by factors such as disrupted markets and lower levels of public expenditure. Young men who are returning from war and are unable to find productive employment may end up participating in illicit activities or taking up arms again.

Post-conflict recovery strategies need to be tailored to the specific circumstances of individual countries. An economic recovery programme needs to reconstruct physical facilities and rebuild institutions as well as laying the foundations for economic growth. It also needs to address factors likely to increase the risk of conflict recurrence. There are four major objectives for post-conflict recovery:

  • Providing the conditions to generate economic recovery and growth. Economic growth in post-conflict countries reduces the risk of renewed armed conflict.
  • Generating employment and other economic opportunities, especially for youth. Severe unemployment or underemployment seems to increase the risk of conflict recurrence.
  • Tackling horizontal inequalities, if severe. Inequalities between culturally-defined groups have become increasingly recognised as major causes of violent conflicts.
  • Managing natural resources and distributing the revenues in a transparent and equitable way. Lucrative natural resources affect the incidence, and sometimes also the duration, of conflicts.

Source

UNDP, 2008, 'Legacies of Armed Conflict', in Post-Conflict Economic Recovery: Enabling Local Ingenuity, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR), United Nations Development Programme, New York, pp. 14-47

Related Content

War Economy in North East Nigeria
Helpdesk Report
2020
Doing research in fragile contexts
Literature Review
2019
Conflict and gender dynamics in Yemen
Helpdesk Report
2017
Gender and conflict in the Western Balkans
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more