• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»Document Library»The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education

The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education

Library
H. A. Patrinos , F. Barrera-Osorio, J. Guáqueta
2009

Summary

How effective are public-private partnerships (PPPs) at improving education in the developing world? This book, published by the World Bank, argues that PPPs can increase equity in education systems and improve education quality. In addition, such arrangements can make service delivery effective and expand possibilities for financing the education sector. Although few rigorous studies have been undertaken, early indications from the recent private education boom indicate that heightened efficiency, more choice and wider access result. Overall, better test scores seem to come from privately-operated institutions, even if they are publicly financed, and private management appears to be more efficient.

The World Bank has several years’ experience of investigating private sector participation in the provision of public goods. Recently completed and ongoing impact evaluations are now available, as well as a growing international literature and a framework set out by the World Development Report 2004. Many parts of the developing world continue to experience low rates of school enrollment, especially for low-income families, girls and indigenous peoples. Poor quality, inefficiency and lack of inclusiveness are also issues. In the PPPs explored here, government is responsible for policy and financing, while actual service delivery is contracted to private providers.

As many as seven different forms of contracting are currently in use internationally. For instance, some governments buy services such as teacher training and curriculum design, while others contract for actual management of schools. Vouchers are another controversial option deserving of consideration. Other findings are that:

  • Countries are on a continuum in their use of PPPs, ranging from those which reject them entirely to those where education is publicly financed but privately operated.
  • Heavier involvement by private interests in education increases overall expertise and capacity in the sector. There is an added benefit in PPPs’ ability to avoid operating restrictions such as fixed salary scales and rigid work rules.
  • Policy changes and regulatory frameworks have a role to play in enabling private schools to thrive in developing countries.
  • Although good design is crucial in PPP arrangements, actual implementation may be weak, exposing governments to the risks of fallout. Implementation can be improved by hosting a transparent and competitive bidding process for contracts, splitting purchaser and provider roles and emphasising communications and outcome evaluations.

The following recommendations should help in the conceptualisation of PPPs’ role in education, and in the improvement of PPPs’ performance:

  • Performance standards should enable accurate and straightforward measurement of school quality and efficiency. Particular emphasis should be given not only to quantitative measures such as standardised tests, but also to qualitative ones, such as parent surveys and school inspections.
  • Private schools must meet certain operating requirements and performance and curriculum standards. Only when such eligibility criteria are met should public funding be disbursed.
  • Education ministries should reward innovation, including with monetary awards, and revoke subsidies when sanctions are appropriate.
  • In some cases, governments should help private schools with capacity-building interventions before beginning voucher programmes.
  • PPP programmes should fall under the authority of a specialised group of experts, who can manage funding to privately operated institutions and enforce standards.  

Source

Patrinos, H.A., Barrera-Osorio, F. and Guáqueta, J., 2009, 'The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education', Education Section, Human Development Department, World Bank, Washington D.C.

Related Content

Workplace-based Learning and Youth Employment in Africa
Literature Review
2020
Aid and non-state armed groups
Helpdesk Report
2020
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
Benefits of STEM Education
Helpdesk Report
2019
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022