- This paper presents findings on multi-country research designed to shed light on the institutional sources of variation in public goods’ provision at the sub-national level. It focuses on key bottlenecks to improvement in maternal mortality, water and sanitation, facilitation of markets and enterprise, and public order and security.
- Three clusters of issues and associated explanatory variables are identified, which seem to account for much of the variation in outcomes. These include:
- The degree to which ‘the policy-driven components of the institutional framework of public goods’ provision reflect a coherent vision, so that resources are allocated and incentives are structured in ways that are mutually reinforcing, not mutually undermining;
- The human-resource components of provision are subject to effective top-down performance disciplines, even if in other respects the organisational context is severely lacking in the attributes of a well-resourced and well regulated bureaucracy;
- And there are institutions enabling local collective action which are locally anchored, in a double sense – the rules they incorporate are welfare-enhancing (problem-solving) in the context, and they make use of institutional elements inherited from the past which motivate, enable and guide individuals to take particular actions’ (pp.4-5).
- Other variables include the incidence of on-the-campaign-trail, populist policy-making by national politicians, and the degree to which aid generates the negative incentive effects identified in the literature.
