• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Community-based social protection

Community-based social protection

Helpdesk Report
  • Evie Browne
October 2013

Question

What generalised observations are possible to make about community-based social protection mechanisms' effectiveness across different contexts? How do formal social protection programmes build upon these mechanisms to improve social outcomes and what impact do formal mechanisms have on CBSP?

Summary

This report reviews the use and effectiveness of community-based social protection (CBSP) mechanisms, and examines how they are integrated into formal social protection schemes and what impact this might have. It begins with a loose definition of the terms used, followed by a section on the evidence on how effective CBSP appears to be. The following section presents the main observations about CBSP features which appear to generalisable across different contexts, and any evidence on how these interact with formal social protection.

The key findings of this report include:

  • Effectiveness of CBSP: Effectiveness is hard to present, as informal mechanisms are often unevaluated, and/or do not have clearly measureable results and outcomes. The strongest evidence on effectiveness is in the health insurance literature.
  • Integration: The literature agrees that formal and informal social protection have many complementarities and could work together to form a holistic social protection system. However, there are few examples of this in operation.
  • Networks: CBSP relies on social networks. This can be effective at the small-scale, but is inequitable and unreliable. The literature is unclear whether formal social protection erodes or supports traditional networks of reciprocal exchange.
  • Inequality: CBSP can be quite unequal in access and coverage. Formal social protection has a role to play in making CBSP more equitable.
  • Dealing with risk: CBSP is vulnerable to covariate risk and more effective for idiosyncratic risk.
  • Political impacts: There is some evidence that women’s organising can help strengthen CBSP and that community groups can develop a strong voice which may contribute to political institutions.
  • Community-based health insurance (CBHI): This area has the strongest evidence base. CBHI has positive effects on reducing out-of-pocket spending for members, and somewhat weaker evidence that it improves standards of care.
  • Targeting: Community participation helps social protection to be better targeted.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • Australian Government

Related Content

Social protection
Topic Guide
2019
Social protection and child labour in Asia
Helpdesk Report
2017
Governance in Tribal Environments
Helpdesk Report
2007
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022