• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
  • Social Development
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Cross-party Caucuses

Cross-party Caucuses

Helpdesk Report
  • Claire Mcloughlin
May 2009

Question

What is the international experience in cross-party caucuses in Parliament, especially those of marginalised communities? How do cross-party parliamentary forums/caucuses work in other countries and what lessons do they have to offer?

Summary

Caucuses are widely believed to be important forums for bringing parliamentarians together across political party lines – so that they may share information, discuss policy issues, channel common interests and concerns, and engage civil society. Some women’s caucuses have been noted for their unique approach towards fostering good governance. In some conflict contexts, caucuses have also proven useful in forging regional identities that cut across ideological and party lines.

There seems to be limited documentation on international experience with caucuses. However, the literature highlights some models of cross- and single-party caucuses in different countries. The lessons learned from these case studies include the following:

  • Caucuses have to address tendencies of the majority-group leadership of the various political parties to inject partisan politics into caucus work.
  • The very fact that parliamentarians have organised around a particular issue in the form of a caucus increases visibility and legitimacy.
  • The caucus provides support to its group, informally and formally.
  • Minority interests are rarely monolithic and even where priority interests are agreed, it is often difficult for caucus members to agree on the best way of addressing them.
  • Minority representatives must often balance many competing interests as minority legislators inside majority institutions.
  • In some contexts, attempts to create a multi-party forum, such as for women MPs in South Africa, have floundered.
  • Caucuses facilitate communication within parties and within regions.
  • Minority parliamentarians, and through them, their caucuses need technical support.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Nepal

Related Content

Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Government Communication Capacity and Media Freedom
Helpdesk Report
2019
Strengthening the Financial Independence of Independent Media Organisations
Helpdesk Report
2018
Youth initiatives supporting citizen engagement with government
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022