• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Drivers of conflict in the Swat Valley, Pakistan

Drivers of conflict in the Swat Valley, Pakistan

Helpdesk Report
September 2016

Question

What were the main drivers of ‘militancy’ (conflict) in the Swat valley of Pakistan in 2008-2009, and what has been the impact of interventions, such as the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation 2009, in addressing key grievances?

Summary

There is a substantial body of literature that explores drivers of conflict in the Swat Valley, but assessments of the impact of interventions are more limited. While the drivers of conflict in the Swat Valley have some unique characteristics, it is difficult to separate these from the genesis of militancy in the wider Afghanistan/Pakistan border region given their shared history.

Drivers include:

  • Historical factors linked to the colonial and post-colonial legacy of the Swat Valley’s absorption into the British Empire and later independent Pakistan.
  • Religious factors and the role religious leaders play in Swat Valley society.
  • Political and judicial factors such as the underdeveloped judicial system and ineffective local government which created social cleavages and played a major role in the rise of TNSM and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan as political forces in the area.
  • Cross-border ethnic ties and insurgent activity in the context of Pakistan/Afghanistan.
  • Women’s participation in education and work. Although this was not initially a central conflict issue, it became a focal point at a later stage with the destruction of girls’ schools and attacks on working women.
  • Marginalisation and inequity.

Attempts to resolve the underlying drivers of conflict in the Swat Valley have included military, humanitarian/developmental and legislative interventions. The Pakistan Government’s response to the conflict has been the adoption of a three-pronged strategy based on dialogue, development, and deterrence. The Nizam-e-Adl Regulation formally enshrined Sharia law in the Malakand in a bid to placate insurgents and to address grievances that are understood to drive support for Sharia law. However, literature suggests that more needs to be done to implement the objectives set out in this legislation.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 324 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Suggested citation

Avis, W. (2016). Drivers of conflict in the Swat Valley, Pakistan (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1,398). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

Cross-border pastoral mobility and cross-border conflict in Africa – patterns and policy responses
Conflict Analysis
2022
Incorporating Gender Perspective in Peace Operations since 2018
Helpdesk Report
2021
Gender, countering violent extremism and women, peace and security in Kenya
Helpdesk Report
2020
Media/communications on peacebuilding/social cohesion/changing prevailing narratives on conflict
Helpdesk Report
2020
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022