• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Evidence on ‘rule of law’ aid initiatives

Evidence on ‘rule of law’ aid initiatives

Helpdesk Report
  • Evie Browne
October 2013

Question

Does the rule of law boost development and reduce poverty? Provide evidence from successful aid initiatives.

Summary

This report reviews the contribution of rule of law to development and poverty reduction, with evidence from aid initiatives. The first section provides a brief overview of the evidence base on the links between rule of law and development and poverty reduction. The second looks at evidence from successful aid initiatives, focusing on how interventions have contributed to rule of law and why they have been successful. Policing interventions are highlighted as a specific sub-area of interest in the third section.

Links found between rule of law and development and poverty reduction:

  • Causal relationships between rule of law and development are not clear; the most recent literature suggests this relationship is complex and unknown.
  • It is critical to engage with local processes and/or gain local buy-in. In some cases this includes supporting informal and customary institutions.
  • Property rights and the enforcement of contracts are often cited as necessary for an enabling business environment.
  • A gender focus is imperative, as women are often discriminated against in the legal system.

Aid initiatives contributing to rule of law:

  • Incremental, ‘good-enough’ approaches appear to work best, especially where they build on local understandings of rule of law and existing institutions.
  • Legal empowerment and enabling poor people’s access to law is as important as strengthening the institutions themselves.
  • Successful interventions are often capacity-building.
  • Rural outreach and access to justice programmes have also been successful.

Policing:

  • Capacity-building is the most successful approach, but there is no clear evidence on how interventions to improve police forces affect development outcomes.
  • Crime, violence and the absence of security are suggested as important constraints on economic growth and as drivers of poverty.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • Australian Government

Related Content

Justice systems in the Sahel
Helpdesk Report
2020
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
Drivers and enablers of serious organised crime in Southeast Asia
Helpdesk Report
2019
Serious and Organized Crime in Jordan
Helpdesk Report
2019
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by FCDO are © FCDO Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more