• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Three-tier federalism: examples and lessons

Three-tier federalism: examples and lessons

Helpdesk Report
  • Edward Laws
June 2017

Question

Identify countries with a three-tier federal structure where exclusive legislative powers are granted to local government. What lessons emerge from literature analysing these national governance structures?

Summary

In most federal systems, municipalities are integrated into the state governments. Yet Argentina, Brazil, South Africa and Switzerland have adopted a three-tier federal structure in which exclusive legislative powers are granted to local government, below state and provincial government.

While decentralisation has the potential to improve accountability and give greater voice to the users of services, the complex relationships among three levels of government may hinder effectiveness and efficiency. Moreover, devolving powers to the lowest possible level is only likely to improve outcomes if the lowest level has sufficient capacity to exercise those powers.

  • In Argentina, municipalities’ low levels of constitutional autonomy and decision-making authority have hindered efforts to implement social policy through national-local policy collaboration.
  • By contrast, the successful experience of social protection programmes in Brazil indicates that municipalities can facilitate the social policy goals established by central government if national policies are implemented directly at the municipal level, without being captured by state governors.
  • In South Africa, many municipalities have had to take on complex responsibilities despite lacking the technical and administrative competence to discharge them successfully. As a result, the country has experienced a failure of policy and an erosion of good governance at local government level.
  • Switzerland has initiated various reforms designed to improve co-operation between the provincial and municipal governments, whose complex relations have been considered opaque and inefficient.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 537 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Suggested citation

Laws, E. (2017). Examples and lessons from three-tier federalism. K4D Helpdesk Report. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.

Related Content

Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions to Address Discrimination against LGBTQi Persons
Helpdesk Report
2021
Increasing Birth Registration for Children of Marginalised Groups in Pakistan
Helpdesk Report
2021
Maintaining basic state functions and service delivery during escalating crises
Helpdesk Report
2021
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023