• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Examples of successful fuel subsidy removal

Examples of successful fuel subsidy removal

Helpdesk Report
  • Sumedh Rao
October 2011

Question

Identify developing country examples of successful removal of fuel subsidies and identify why they were successful. How did they make it a) politically feasible and b) help cushion the impact on the poor, middle class and the vested interests.

Summary

Where fuel prices are controlled and subsidised by the government, price increases have often met with broad public opposition and, in some cases, violent demonstration. Where governments have been successful they have needed to ensure that reform was politically feasible and the impact on influential groups was mitigated. There are a number of countries which have instituted reforms with some degree of success. These countries have usually undertaken various activities, often different activities simultaneously. This report is focused on examples from both low- and middle-income developing countries.

Factors that seem to have contributed to success include: strong research/social and political analysis; cash or in-kind transfers to cushion the impact on the poor; policy coherence; a phased approach; attention to public trust; public campaigns; and persistence and adaptability that keeps in mind the key objectives. For example:

  • Independent research, conducted early on, can quantify the level of subsidy, assess distribution of its costs and benefits and estimate the likely effects of its removal; and can inform cash transfer targeting.
  • To protect lower-income households, several governments initiated cash transfer or benefit-in-kind processes. Such schemes must involve a low-cost administrative mechanism.
  • Public education campaigns have been used to promote understanding of the rationale for subsidy removal.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Conflict Prevention and National Security Group

Related Content

Infrastructure Project Failures in Colombia
Helpdesk Report
2018
Local financing for infrastructure in Zambia
Helpdesk Report
2017
Effectiveness of tax reform interventions
Helpdesk Report
2017
Impacts of tax capacity on development outcomes 
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023