GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Gender-related results in security and justice policy and programming

Gender-related results in security and justice policy and programming

Helpdesk Report
  • Siân Herbert
October 2014

Question

What is the evidence from security and justice programming and policy around achievement of gender-related results and demonstrating gender sensitivity, and what are the lessons for improving practice in future?
Key facets: (1) (The resolution of) unequal/disadvantageous property, economic, and inheritance rights; (2) Women's empowerment and representation within security and justice service delivery (successes and failures).

Summary

There is a paucity of evidence that examines the overall impacts of security and justice programming on gender-related results in the two areas of this query. The literature available tends to be donor funded evaluations and policy papers, it tends to be fragmented, and it tends to examine programmes on a case-by-case basis. Security and justice programing is highly context specific and there are few proven approaches or models (Woodrow, 2013). In light of this, this query focusses on micro-level evidence that illustrates how specific interventions have led to specific gender-related results. While both fragile and non-fragile developing countries are examined, security and justice programming tends to occur more in fragile countries.

Strategies for integrating a gender perspective into security and justice interventions include gender mainstreaming, in which the impact of all policies and programmes on women, men, girls and boys are considered at every stage of the programming cycle (Valasek, 2008); gender balancing, or ensuring equal representation of men and women in institutions and oversight bodies (Valasek, 2008); and gender-specific interventions such as training and capacity building, creating gender units within the police, and awareness raising and sensitisation of women’s rights with security and justice institutions.

Findings include:

  • When addressing unequal inheritance, property and economic rights, typical interventions that have led to gender-related results include: changing laws and constitutions, working with customary justice systems, adopting international conventions, legal empowerment, sensitisation, awareness raising and education programmes, litigation, and institutional reforms and capacity development.
  • When addressing women’s empowerment and representation in service delivery institutions, typical interventions that have led to gender-related results include: supporting paralegal services, sensitisation, awareness raising and education programmes, providing legal aid, all-women justice and security services, gender sensitive disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration, gender balancing, and supporting women’s and civil society groups.
  • Cross-cutting lessons include: transforming social norms and behaviours; ensuring policies are translated into programming; and strengthening evidence based reforms.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions to Address Discrimination against LGBTQi Persons
Helpdesk Report
2021
Documentation of survivors of gender-based violence (GBV)
Helpdesk Report
2021
LGBT rights and inclusion in Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".