• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Girls’ access to economic assets

Girls’ access to economic assets

Helpdesk Report
  • Erika Fraser
October 2011

Question

Please identify a selection of evaluations that have been done to assess the impact of programmes to increase girls’ access to and use of economic assets (quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods evaluations). Highlight the evaluation questions posed, evaluation methods and key findings.

Summary

The literature suggests that increasing girls’ access to and use of economic assets has potentially far-reaching impacts on other aspects of their lives. However, to date, there have been few rigorous evaluations of girls’ economic empowerment programmes, particularly those which provide tangible productive/financial assets. The few evaluations available suggest that evaluations most commonly use a combination of methodologies to measure the impact of interventions, and a variety of evaluation questions and indicators, including:

  • Access to and use of economic assets
  • School enrolment and progression
  • Reproductive knowledge and behaviour
  • Voice and participation
  • Changes in girls’ expectations and aspirations, as well as those of their parents
  • Changing attitudes and values

Key findings from the evaluation reports and literature reviewed suggest that:

  • There is mixed evidence about the economic viability of microcredit programmes for adolescent girls involving tangible assets such as cash/loans.
  • There are some improvements in educational outcomes, including school enrolment and achievement.
  • The impact on reproductive knowledge and risk-taking sexual health behaviours is mixed.
  • There is also some evidence that increasing access to economic assets can help girls to: gain respect from family members and a greater share in household or community resources; have more liberal gender attitudes; increase their awareness of rights; and improve their standard of living and economic independence.

Full respons:

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Evaluation Department

Related Content

The future of work for women in the Indo-Pacific region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Barriers to Women's Economic Inclusion in Tanzania
Helpdesk Report
2018
Models of Gender-Sensitive Procurement Used by International Aid Entities
Helpdesk Report
2018
Mapping Women's Economic Exclusion in Tanzania
Helpdesk Report
2018
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023