• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Impact of telecommunications reform on service delivery

Impact of telecommunications reform on service delivery

Helpdesk Report
  • Claire Mcloughlin
May 2012

Question

Please identify, review and synthesise literature on international experience in telecommunications reform contributing to service delivery and the potential add on benefits for service delivery in fragile and weak states. Areas of interest are: what is available, extent of adoption, practical challenges for implementation, and evidence of sustainable improvements in service delivery.

Summary

Telecommunications have been shown to have a range of direct, indirect and intangible benefits on development and poverty reduction goals (Bhavnani et al, 2008). Where the literature allows, the report includes examples of how telecommunications reform has enabled better service outcomes in fragile and conflict-affected states, and some of the challenges of implementation in these types of environments.

The literature on telecommunications reform in developing countries is limited in several ways:

  • Although a strict definition of telecommunications would encompass a variety of ways of transmitting information via a wired or wireless network (including mobile and land line telephones, internet and radio), the vast majority of recent policy literature has been primarily concerned with the mobile phone sector.
  • The literature is unevenly focused on the health and agriculture sectors, and there is relatively little evidence of the effects of telecommunications on education, or water and sanitation.
  • While there are a growing number of illustrative case studies indicating the potential impact of telecommunications on service delivery, there are very few examples from so-called fragile states.
  • While illustrative case study examples of impact are available, telecommunications for service delivery is a relatively new area, and many interventions to date have taken the form of pilot initiatives. Evidence of their impact often tends to be anecdotal (Aker and Mbiti, 2010).

Notwithstanding the need for more rigorous evidence of impact, there is consensus in the literature that the potential benefits of telecommunications reform for service delivery are wide-reaching.

Much of the literature emphasises that the key contribution of telecommunications to service delivery is to enhance the exchange of information and data, thereby reducing transaction costs for poor people, and addressing information asymmetries that can occur in any sector and hinder service outcomes for users (Aker and Mbiti, 2010; Rashid and Elder, 2009). Telecommunications are also seen to offer cross-sectoral opportunities to promote inclusive development. There is also a growing literature on how telecommunications, and social media in particular, can contribute to less tangible outcomes such as building social capital and enhancing social development.

Several challenges in applying telecommunications to service delivery have been identified, both at the level of infrastructure and institutions. Poor quality or lack of infrastructure, particularly in rural areas, coupled with low investment and state monopolies, has been a barrier to universal coverage (Williams, Mayer and Minges, 2011). Political and regulatory instability can add to these problems (ITU, 2011). Many pilot schemes have been difficult to scale up in practice (ITU, 2011; Zhenwei Qiang, 2012; Kaplan, 2006).

The exponential growth in the telecommunications sector over the past two decades (particularly the mobile phone sector) in both developing and developed countries is now widely documented (Aker and Mbiti, 2010). Quantitative studies have found correlations between living standards and the availability and use of telecommunications services (see Bhavnani et al, 2008 for a comprehensive overview). However, the growth in telecommunications has not reached all segments of the population and the majority of the rural poor have been left out of the ICT revolution (Bhavnani et al, 2008).

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • Australian Government

Related Content

Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Government Communication Capacity and Media Freedom
Helpdesk Report
2019
Strengthening the Financial Independence of Independent Media Organisations
Helpdesk Report
2018
Youth initiatives supporting citizen engagement with government
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023