GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Lessons learned for national state entities for recovery and reconstruction

Lessons learned for national state entities for recovery and reconstruction

Helpdesk Report
  • Becky Carter
August 2015

Question

What is the evidence on national state entities responsible for recovery and reconstruction programmes after natural disasters, in particular earthquakes?

Summary

Key indicative lessons learned for national state entities from the literature reviewed include:

Structure

  • Develop national recovery frameworks in advance of disasters.
  • Appoint a lead agency with a built-in end date, a clear legal mandate and an experienced politically aware leader.
  • Integrate the immediate humanitarian action into the government-coordinated recovery phase.
  • Fully engage all national and local state institutions, with responsibilities clearly articulated.
  • Institutionalise an empowering and inclusive participatory approach, and decentralised implementation.
  • Clarify the roles of international agencies from the outset

Policy

  • Adopt policy principles of build back better, converting adversity into opportunity and pro-poor recovery.
  • Support gender equality and mainstream gender-sensitive approaches.

Governance

  • Develop a national recovery vision and strategic and programmatic framework.
  • Set up government-led coordination mechanisms and continuously consult and communicate with national and international stakeholders.
  • Set up flexible national public finance management and pre-arranged procurement systems with accountability and transparency safeguards. Multi-donor trust funds can coordinate and manage risk and create a policy and coordination forum.

Programme management

  • Simplify standard implementation procedures, develop reconstruction standards and implement effective monitoring and evaluation systems.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 574 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Suggested citation

Carter, B. (2015). Lessons learned for national state entities for recovery and reconstruction. (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1254). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

Supporting and rebuilding agriculture in protracted crises
Helpdesk Report
2017
Transitional shelter in post-disaster contexts
Helpdesk Report
2016
Seasonal vulnerability and risk calendar in Nepal
Helpdesk Report
2016
National Disaster Management Authorities
Helpdesk Report
2016

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".