• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
  • Blogs
Home»GSDRC Publications»Links between gender-based violence and outbreaks of violent conflict

Links between gender-based violence and outbreaks of violent conflict

Helpdesk Report
  • Siân Herbert
November 2014

Question

What evidence exists for links between gender-based violence and outbreaks of violent conflict?

Summary

  • Gender-based violence (GBV) is prevalent in all contexts and countries of the world.
  • There are studies that quantitatively find a strong correlation between levels of structural/institutional GBV (manifested as gender inequality) and conflict (e.g. Caprioli, 2005, etc). They find that gender inequality increases the likelihood that a state will have internal conflict. Countries with low human rights standards (including on gender inequality) are more likely to have militarised and violent interstate disputes (during the period 1980 to 2001). However, the nature of the relationship is not clear.
  • There are a few studies that quantitatively find a relationship between interpersonal GBV (the physical security of women) and the relative peacefulness of states. Emerging research has found that countries with high levels of national violence against women and girls (e.g. domestic violence, female infanticide and sex-selective abortion) have been more likely to experience armed conflict than those which do not (Hudson, et al., 2009, in Saferworld, 2013).
  • Some argue that GBV is a form of violent conflict in itself, and is not necessarily an indicator of future conflict.
  • Traditional gender identities can be drivers of conflict as men are framed as protectors and fighters, while women are vulnerable and need protecting. During periods of conflict these identities can be accentuated and politicised.
  • Indicators on gender norms which drive conflict (e.g. violent ideas of masculinity) might be more useful for early warning.
  • Throughout history, and during conflicts in different parts of the world, there have been incidences where GBV has exacerbated conflict and led to revenge attacks.
  • Levels of GBV are higher during and after armed conflict. Sexual violence can be part of strategies during in violent conflicts. GBV often does not subside post-conflict. It affects both men and women in different ways.
  • Sexual and gender-based violence remains the most widespread and serious protection problems facing displaced and returnee women and girls.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Documentation of survivors of gender-based violence (GBV)
Helpdesk Report
2021
Key Drivers of Modern Slavery
Helpdesk Report
2020
Interventions to Reduce Forced Marriage
Helpdesk Report
2019
Preventing/Countering Violent Extremism Programming on Men, Women, Boys and Girls
Helpdesk Report
2019
birminghamids hcri

Contact Us Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more