• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
  • Social Development
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Poor people’s rights and successful legal actions

Poor people’s rights and successful legal actions

Helpdesk Report
  • Emilie Combaz
February 2013

Question

Please provide case studies of how poor people, or civil society acting on their behalf, have successfully claimed their human rights through legal mechanisms. The case studies should describe the legal actions successfully taken on a rights issue (as used in combination with other types of social mobilisation), and the short- and long-term impact these actions have had for poor people on the issue considered. Cases should focus on hard law mechanisms. If possible, the cases should cover a range of human rights and a broad geographical scope, with cases on sub-Saharan Africa and Asia focused on human rights claims at the national level.

Summary

Key finding: Landmark rulings by South Africa’s Constitutional Court in favour of poor people’s social and economic rights since the 1990s have drawn widespread attention to the law as a tool for realising poor people’s rights and tackling the underlying systemic problems in a way that empowers individuals and communities. But while there has been broad support for using the law to implement poor people’s rights, there have also been debates and doubts about the actual impact of such practices, even when courts have given a positive ruling. This is important especially given the heavy investment of funds, time and skills legal action can require.

This helpdesk report focuses on hard law, national level legal mechanisms, and economic, social and cultural rights in relation to poverty. The three cases from India, Brazil and Mexico documented here were selected based on the availability of strong literature, and on diversity with regard to the human rights and legal systems covered.

The report presents a general overview of the literature on poor people’s rights claims. The following sections present the three cases studied:

  • the right to food in India;
  • the right to health in Brazil;
  • sexual and reproductive rights in Mexico.

The first part of each case study describes the issue and mobilisations, and then summarises the legal action taken in the specific case(s) considered. The second part addresses the impact of the successful legal action, with regard to both immediate and further effects.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Policy Division

Related Content

Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions to Address Discrimination against LGBTQi Persons
Helpdesk Report
2021
Increasing Birth Registration for Children of Marginalised Groups in Pakistan
Helpdesk Report
2021
Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief
Helpdesk Report
2021
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022