• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Refugee return in protracted refugee situations

Refugee return in protracted refugee situations

Helpdesk Report
  • Brigitte Rohwerder
September 2015

Question

What refugee return initiatives have occurred in Africa? What lessons have been learnt from successful/sustainable return processes across the world, especially in relation to protracted refugee situations?

Summary

Voluntary repatriation/return is seen as one of the durable solutions to protracted refugee situations and is the ‘preferred’ solution of the international community. Successful or sustainable return processes require the reintegration of refugees, which can be complicated by their protracted refugee experience and conditions in the country of origin.

Evidence from case studies indicates that return is often protracted or cyclical; it can be spontaneous or assisted; returns can happen rapidly or at a slower pace; and resolving protracted refugee caseloads often involves resettlement and local integration, as well as return to country of origin. Security, access to adequate services, housing, and livelihood opportunities are key to return.

Lessons for initiatives prior to return

  • Access to quality, trustworthy information is important for refugee decision making about return.
  • Return programmes need to take into account conflict dynamics and the political economy.
  • Establishing security, access to adequate services, housing, and livelihoods can be conducive to return as these are key for refugees.
  • Treatment in host countries is not enough to ‘push’ refugees; the decision to stay or return is informed by a comparison of conditions in host countries and countries of origin.
  • Access to livelihood assets, social networks, and opportunities in the country of origin can result in early return.
  • Poverty both restrains and encourages return, with poorer refugees less likely to return and reintegrate sustainably.
  • Local integration could equip refugees for sustainable return by giving them an ability to build up assets which can contribute to reintegration.
  • Preparation for return while in exile can help refugees reintegrate.

Lessons for initiatives to support return

  • Return can be staggered or cyclical; and mobility is a key strategy in its sustainability.
  • Effective support for refugee return is demand driven.
  • A comprehensive integrated approach between humanitarian, development, government and private sector actors is needed.
  • Flexibility in funding can assist sustainable return.
  • Return programmes need to account for increasing urbanisation, as many refugees prefer to settle in urban areas rather than in rural areas.

Lessons for initiatives to help reintegration

  • Addressing land and other restitution and redress issues in important for livelihoods and sustainable return.
  • Return processes should be integrated in wider development processes and assist whole communities.
  • Ethnic and other forms of discrimination can impede sustainable return by making it impossible for some groups to return.
  • Return programmes need to take into account the diverse experiences of refugees which impact on their prospects for sustainable return and reintegration.
  • Women face particular challenges in return.

Lessons for initiatives to ensure sustainability of refugee return

  • Sustainability of return is weakened by politically driven planning which does not account for the needs of the refugees.
  • Unsustainable return can have a negative impact on peacebuilding.

 

file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 682 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Suggested citation

Rohwerder, B. (2015). Refugee return in protracted refugee situations (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1282). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

Integrated approaches to refugee management in Uganda
Helpdesk Report
2020
Cash-Based Initiatives for Refugees in Jordan: Annotated Bibliography
Helpdesk Report
2019
Cost-Effectiveness in Humanitarian Work: Integration of Displaced Persons into Host Community Services
Helpdesk Report
2018
Refugees in Uganda: (in)stability, conflict, and resilience
Conflict Analysis
2018
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more