• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Safe spaces for girls: six-country mapping

Safe spaces for girls: six-country mapping

Helpdesk Report
  • Evie Browne
May 2013

Question

Provide a mapping of the existing good practice girl safe space programmes in Kenya, Nigeria, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania and Bangladesh.

Summary

This review presents a broad overview of the most prominent and well-evidenced programmes providing safe spaces for girls in six selected countries.

Key findings

The criteria for defining a ‘safe space’ followed the Population Council’s guidance, and the following programmes all contain these elements:

  • A physical space where adolescent girls (10-19 years old) meet regularly
  • An older or peer mentor
  • Life skills and/or vocational skills training along with socialisation and recreation
  • The six selected countries showed a large variety in the scope of programmes provided, from BRAC in Bangladesh reaching half a million girls, to small CBOs in Uganda reaching 450 girls in nearby villages. The variety in scope indicates that these programmes can be effectively implemented at different scales. The location of programmes was also varied, with an approximately equal mix of meetings taking place in schools, community centres, public spaces and homes.

    The issues taught in the life skills components were largely 1) sexual and reproductive health, 2) financial literacy or livelihoods training, and 3) social issues. The target groups were again varied and no clear trend emerged. Small programmes often targeted broadly all girls of the right age range in the area, and many only described their beneficiaries as ‘vulnerable’. Programmes were mostly run in rural areas or urban slums, so most girls were deemed poor, vulnerable, at risk of early marriage or pregnancy and with low levels of empowerment. The age range of girls was also quite varied, but there is a slight weighting towards earlier adolescence, as many programmes mainly worked with girls aged 10-16 years.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Poverty and Vulnerabillity Team

Related Content

Gender, countering violent extremism and women, peace and security in Kenya
Helpdesk Report
2020
Gender and countering violent extremism (CVE) in the Kenya Mozambique region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Key Drivers of Modern Slavery
Helpdesk Report
2020
Social and behaviour change communication interventions in Mozambique
Helpdesk Report
2020
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by FCDO are © FCDO Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more