• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Supporting local governance in protracted conflicts

Supporting local governance in protracted conflicts

Helpdesk Report
  • Anna Strachan
July 2014

Question

Please provide examples of successful interventions to support the delivery of services by local governments and administrations in areas where there is a protracted conflict?

Summary

Successful interventions to support the delivery of services by local governments and administrations have been undertaken in a number of countries, including Afghanistan, Nepal, Somalia and Sudan. The majority of these interventions fall into the community-based approaches category. These are often used in areas where there is no effective local government or where supporting local government is considered undesirable. Where direct support is provided to local governments to enable or improve service delivery in areas of protracted conflict, it is often used as a way to enhance state legitimacy.

Examples of interventions where there is some evidence of success include:

  • National Solidarity Programme (NSP) Afghanistan: Evaluations indicate that the Community Development Council (CDC) component of the NSP provided a means of reaching communities in the absence of effective local government and succeeded in building confidence in the state.
  • Village Development Programme (VDP) Nepal: Evaluations found that the VDP was successful in improving access to services for the rural poor, even when local government was absent as a result of conflict.
  • UNDP’s Joint Programme for Local Governance (JPLG) Somalia: The programme’s 2012 annual report indicates that its community consultation processes project enabled communities to develop long-term social and economic development priorities, and strengthened village governance structures.
  • Community-based organisation (CBO) networks in Sudan: A qualitative research study found that CBO networks were successfully established in Darfur to enable the remote management of projects by international agencies.
  • UNDP’s Afghanistan Subnational Governance Programme (ASGP): The programme’s 2013 annual progress report indicates that the ASGP made significant progress in supporting local government to improve service delivery.
  • UNICEF’s Making Public Private Partnerships (PPP) work for rural water supply in Somalia programme: An independent evaluation of the programme found that it led to some improvement in the quality of service delivery in Somaliland and Puntland.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Political economy of Papua New Guinea and the water, sanitation and hygiene sector
Helpdesk Report
2019
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
G7 and G20 commitments on health
Helpdesk Report
2019
Implications of Not Addressing Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) Needs in Conflict Situations
Helpdesk Report
2019
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2019; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2019; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2019
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2019; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2019; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2019

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more