GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Evaluation Capacity Development

Evaluation Capacity Development

Helpdesk Report
  • Becky Carter
September 2013

Question

Strengthening evaluation capacity requires addressing constraints on both the supply and demand of evaluation. Is there existing evidence of: A) Approaches that are more successful for developing (or building) capacity for evaluation supply in developing countries? B) What approaches are effective at building evaluation demand and the use of evaluation evidence? C) How endogenous public, civil society, academic, private sector, and other suppliers/commissioners can be strengthened? D) What financial support mechanisms (e.g. challenge funds, project or programme support, etc.) are best suited for building capacity without undermining local ownership?

Summary

While donors’ efforts to support evaluation capacities of developing countries have increased over the last 20 years, this rapid review of the literature finds a limited evidence base on evaluation capacity development (ECD) approaches and their effectiveness. There are more reports of innovative and good practices than rigorous evidence on what has worked.

Nevertheless, the literature identifies key lessons for ECD approaches, including:

  • The fundamental principles of being demand-driven; context-specific; focused on strengthening incentives; working with evaluation systems; addressing demand as well as supply; and integrating human rights and gender equality concerns.
  • A number of recommendations for the ECD process and activities such as, inter alia, assessing existing M&E; integrating ECD as part of a results-based M&E system and identifying clear ECD results; working with champions; adopting a sustained, adaptive roadmap approach; providing follow-up to training interventions; working with stakeholders beyond government; tackling any unintended negative impact of donor evaluation operations; and an emergent focus on building demand and use of evaluation evidence.

The report also summarises findings on strengthening state- and non-state evaluation suppliers and commissioners and the effectiveness of ECD financial support mechanisms, including innovative mechanisms such as challenge funds and South-South partnership support.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Lessons from stabilisation, statebuilding, and development programming in South Sudan
Helpdesk Report
2020
Technical Assistance and Capacity Building in International Development
Helpdesk Report
2019
Public Sector Reform and Capacity Building in Small Island Developing States
Helpdesk Report
2019
Doing research in fragile contexts
Literature Review
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".