GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Deteriorating Governance

Deteriorating Governance

Helpdesk Report
  • Claire Mcloughlin
January 2010

Question

What is the literature on deteriorating governance, including evidence on what can be learnt from past experience (1980s, 90s, 2000s) about how the international community can effectively intervene to support a reversal of deteriorating governance situations?

Summary

The literature on the causes and forms of deteriorating governance is in its infancy, and draws heavily from the broader and more established literature on the causes of forms of fragility. Some of the prominent themes on the causes of deteriorating governance are:

  • Common pathways to deterioration are escalation of communal conflict, state predation, regional or guerilla rebellion, democratic collapse, and succession and reform crises.
  • Identifying situations of declining (state) legitimacy, including the relationship between formal (state) and informal (non-state) sources of legitimacy, may improve the international community’s ability to identify deteriorating governance.
  • Not all forms of political deterioration follow the same trajectory. Forms of deterioration include conventional political deterioration, political deterioration amidst state collapse, political deterioration in transitional governments, risk of destructive political orders.
  • Elections are playing a role as triggers of violence.
  • Informal political orders are prone to political deterioration as much as formal political orders, and this needs to be better understood.
  • Governments are prone to political deterioration where there is lack of progress on essential tasks, or the performance of essential state functions. This includes the inability to provide public security, high levels of corruption, and poor provision of basic services.
  • Increased risks of instability are often the result of transitions toward democratic governance. The quality of governance – specifically the interaction of autocracy and factionalism – are among the main explanatory variables in the onset of political instability.

There appear to be few documented cases, and a lack of consolidated lessons learned, in regard to how international actors can successfully intervene in situations of deteriorating governance. Donor’s written strategies for responding to deteriorating governance tend to emphasize the need to build state accountability and transparency and to maintain enough institutional capital to facilitate eventual turnaround.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Politics and State Team

Related Content

Doing research in fragile contexts
Literature Review
2019
Social Safety Nets in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States
Helpdesk Report
2019
Approaches to remote monitoring in fragile states
Helpdesk Report
2017
Organised crime, violence and development
Topic Guide
2016

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".