How can legislatures ensure the state is really accountable to citizens, and that service delivery is efficient? Why and how should they be strengthened? Within a political system, the ‘legislature’ is the elected or selected body that makes laws for a state. Legislatures (sometimes called parliament, senate or congress) perform three key roles: representation of the people, passing effective legislation, and oversight of government. To fulfil these roles effectively, they must have appropriate powers, committed members and adequate resources. But many parliaments in developing countries are weak and become vehicles for ‘rubber stamping’ legislation. This leads to unaccountable executive powers and can leave a state more susceptible to autocracy and corruption.
The resources below focus on how to create a functioning legislature which provides an effective bridge between the executive and the people.
Page contents:
- Legislative functions
- Parliamentary strengthening
- Parliaments and PRSPs
- Women in parliament
- Parliaments in post-conflict and fragile environments
- Useful websites
Legislative functions
To act as an effective check on the executive and the judiciary, parliaments must be actively involved in all areas of state activity and ensure that the opinions of the electorate are represented.
Case, W., 2011, ‘Executive Accountability in Southeast Asia: The Role of Legislatures in New Democracies and Under Electoral Authoritarianism’, Policy Studies no. 57, East-West Center, Honolulu
Does a new democracy or electoral authoritarianism better allow legislatures to check the executive? This study examines accountability and legislative power in Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Cambodia and Singapore. While legislatures are weaker under electoral authoritarian regimes than in new democracies, they define the opposition better. Opposition members try to use their limited powers to check executive abuses. However, this tends to strengthen authoritarian rule by giving it greater legitimacy.
Access full text: available online
The following materials consider the role of parliaments in specific sectors or areas, including security, health, and budgetary oversight.
Born, H., Fluri, P. and Johnson, A., 2003, ‘Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector: Principles, Mechanisms and Practices’, Inter-Parliamentary Union and Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces
Why is parliamentary oversight of the security sector necessary? What is the role of parliament and how is it best performed? This handbook by the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) and the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) provides a comprehensive picture of current security issues and deals exhaustively with all aspects of parliamentary oversight of the security sector.
Access full text: available online
Mataure, M., 2003, ‘Parliamentary Functions and Reforms and their Application in Promoting Health Equity in Southern Africa’, Discussion Paper no. 16, The Network on Equity in Health in Southern Africa, Harare
Increasing public awareness of rights in Southern African countries has placed responsibility on parliaments to be more effective. How have they gone about reforming? This paper by the Training and Research Support Centre in Harare highlights the effectiveness of the Committee system in strengthening the parliamentary role in the health sector. In particular the committee system has provided a vehicle for involving stakeholders in parliamentary oversight, legislative and representational roles and in drawing technical and financial resources to support more work by parliament.
Access full text: available online
Budgetary oversight
A key role of legislatures is oversight of the budget process. Parliaments should ensure that budgets are fiscally sound, appropriate and are well implemented.
Wehner, J., 2007, ‘Strengthening Legislative Financial Scrutiny in Developing Countries’, Report prepared for the UK Department for International Development by the London School of Economics, London
How can the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) improve its work in strengthening legislative financial oversight? This study from the London School of Economics and Political Science suggests that robust oversight at the country level is crucial for effective direct budget support. DFID’s projects involving legislative financial scrutiny are vulnerable to political risks and achievements are fragile. Nonetheless, where the approach is comprehensive, long-term and builds on local, broad-based support, this work can deliver substantial and cost-effective governance improvements.
Access full text: available online
Santiso, C. and Belgrano, G., 2004, ‘Politics of Budgeting in Peru: Legislative Budget Oversight and Public Financial Accountability in Presidential Systems’, SAIS working paper 01/04, John Hopkins University, Baltimore
What can be done to improve accountability and curb corruption in emerging economies? What should be the role of parliaments in the budgetary process? This study, written for a seminar arranged by the Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean, reviews the dynamics of executive-legislative relations in budget policymaking and oversight in Peru. The experiences after implementing first-generation economic reforms illustrate the limits of expeditious decision-making and the consequent need to strengthen the mechanisms of accountability.
Access full text: available online
Parliamentary strengthening
Because of the important roles played by effective legislatures, donors have been keen to support legislative/parliamentary strengthening programs in developing countries. But political context can determine the shape and effectiveness of these programmes, and reform can be difficult in countries where the executive does not want a strong legislature, where civil society is weak or where resources are constrained.
Rocha Menocal, A., and O’ Neil, T. (2012) Mind the Gap: Lessons Learnt and Remaining Challenges in Parliamentary Development Assistance – A Sida Pre-Study, London: ODI
Parliaments have never been more important. Most countries are now a democracy of some sort and the demands placed on parliamentarians have never been greater. Yet parliaments remain one of the least trusted institutions in the eyes of the population. And, while support to parliaments has steadily grown since the late 1980s, parliamentary development assistance is widely seen as one of the least effective areas of democracy assistance – a reputation that has become ever more problematic in the current results-based climate.
Access full text: available online
Arne, T. and Amundsen, I., 2010, ‘Support to Legislatures: Synthesis Study’, Evaluation Report no. 2, Norad, Oslo
Access full text: available online
Hudson, A. and Wren, C., 2007, ‘Parliamentary Strengthening in Developing Countries’, Report prepared for the Department for International Development (DFID), Overseas Development Institute, London
How can parliaments perform more effectively? Whilst governance programmes focus primarily on the executive and civil society, the potential of parliaments to foster capable, accountable and responsive governance is increasingly recognised. This report from the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) aims to help the Department for International Development (DFID) make informed decisions about contributing to parliamentary strengthening in developing countries. Parliamentary strengthening work should be more long-term and demand-driven. It should address the causes of poor performance, be context-aware, involve recipients and include systematic evaluation.
Access full text: available online
GSDRC, 2008, ‘Lessons Learned on Parliamentary Strengthening’, Helpdesk Research Report, GSDRC, Birmingham
Several agencies have recently conducted stocktakes, retrospectives or reviews of their parliamentary strengthening programmes at agency-level. By far the most common lesson/recommendation relates to the necessity of understanding and adapting to the political context within which parliament is situated and undertaking good political analysis in the planning phase.
Access full text: available online
O’Brien, M., Stapenhurst, R. and Prater, B. (2012). World Bank Institute’s approach to parliamentary capacity strengthening. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(3), pp. 593-607.
What is the World Bank Institute’s (WBI) approach to parliamentary strengthening? This article outlines WBI’s model for strengthening parliamentary capacity globally and regionally by looking at: capacity development and adult learning; challenges in implementing parliamentary capacity support projects; WBI’s parliamentary strengthening model; and a case-study on WBI’s parliamentary staff training. It concludes that a multi-faceted, medium-to-long term process is the best approach to parliamentary capacity building.
Access full text: available online
Toolkits
Europe Aid, 2010, ‘Engaging and Supporting Parliaments Worldwide: Strategies and Methodologies for EC Action in Support to Parliaments’, Reference document no. 8, Tools and Methods Series, European Commission, Brussels
Access full text: available online
IPU, 2008. Evaluating Parliament: A self-assessment toolkit for parliamentarians, Inter-parliamentary Union
IPU introduced this ‘self-assessment toolkit for parliamentarians’ to help parliaments conduct their own legislative needs assessment. IPU states clearly that its purpose is not to rank parliaments; rather, it is to help them identify their strengths and weaknesses against international criteria so they can determine priorities for strengthening the parliamentary institution. It asserts that, because the conclusions are nationally developed and owned, self-assessment has the potential to be an immensely powerful tool for change
Access full text: available online
GSDRC, 2008, ‘Monitoring and Evaluation of Parliamentary Strengthening and Electoral Support Programmes’, Helpdesk Research Report, GSDRC, Birmingham
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) appears to be one of the most neglected components of both parliamentary strengthening and electoral support programmes. The politcal nature of such programmes presents particular challenges in formulating indicators and attributing impacts. In the case of legislative strengthening, much of the literature emphasises the importance of a baseline assessment and participation of national stakeholders to ensure programme sustainability.
Access full text: available online
For a mapping of organisations working on parliamentary strengthening see:
GSDRC, 2008, ‘Donor Activity on Parliamentary Strengthening and Electoral Support’, Helpdesk Research Report, GSDRC, Birmingham
According to a recent study from ODI, the World Bank Institute, the Parliamentary Centre (Canada), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and the National Democratic Institute (NDI) are the major actors in the field of parliamentary strengthening. Parliamentary strengthening programmes typically emphasise training for parliamentarians and parliamentary staff through courses, seminars, workshops, or conferences. Empowering parliaments to exercise legislative oversight of government is a major objective.
Access full text: available online
Parliaments and PRSPs
The involvement of developing country parliaments in the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) process has generally been weak. The following resources explore how to improve their contribution to the development of effective PRSPs and to poverty reduction.
Draman, R., 2007, ‘“Legislating Poverty” in Africa: What role have Parliamentarians been playing in PRSP Implementation and Policy?’, Parliamentary Center and World Bank Institute
To ensure effective implementation of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs), greater recognition has been given in recent years to parliamentarians’ role in oversight and monitoring. This paper from the Parliamentary Centre assesses how effective parliamentary involvement in the PRSP process has been, and what impacts interventions have had on PRS implementation and policy, with a focus on the budget process. The document focuses on seven countries – Ghana, Niger, Tanzania, Malawi, Kenya, Senegal and Zambia. Across parliaments there is still a general lack of knowledge relating to PRSPS, and participation in the process has been problematic.
Access full text: available online
Women in Parliament
Barriers to women’s participation in parliament include male dominated structures, lack of quotas and lack of training. Several countries have set quota targets which has allowed for advances in women’s representation.
Karam, A., 1998, ‘Beyond Token Representation’, in Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, ed. A. Karam, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, pp. 191 – 198
This concluding chapter from an International IDEA publication gives an overview of the socio-economic and socio-cultural obstacles to women’s participation in politics and offers recommendations on how to overcome them, drawing on case studies from Russia, Egypt, Scandinavia, India, Costa Rica and South Africa.
Access full text: available online
GSDRC, 2008, ‘Quotas for Women’s Representation in Africa’, Helpdesk Research Report, GSDRC, Birmingham
The success of quota systems in many African countries is largely attributed to: strong and active women’s movements; regional bodies such as the Southern African Development Community (SADC) that have adopted gender balanced representation and set quota targets for member countries; and opportunities in post-conflict and transition societies, which allowed for advances in women’s representation. It is important to note that women’s movements have also been important in pushing for more balanced representation in regional bodies as well as in peace negotiations and new constitutions.
Access full text: available online
GSDRC, 2008, ‘Gender Equality in Parliamentary Strengthening and Electoral Support:’, Helpdesk Research Report, GSDRC, Birmingham
Whilst many countries around the world have started to adopt measures to help women enter politics and national legislatures, there has been insufficient attention paid to how they can make a difference once they enter parliament. Quotas, for example, can contribute to an increase in the number of women in parliament, but it is the interaction of quota systems with other factors in a particular country, such as the type of electoral system, the legal environment, and the nature of women’s movements, that is key.
Access full text: available online
Markham, S. (2012). Strengthening women’s roles in parliaments. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(3), pp. 688-698.
This article provides an overview of strategies used by the National Democratic Institute for improving democratic governance by increasing women’s representation and men’s awareness of the value of women’s participation in parliaments. Best practices include providing support to women legislators, strengthening the institution, promoting cross-party caucuses and working with gender affairs committees.
Access full text: available online
Parliaments in post-conflict and fragile environments
The resources below discuss how to enhance parliaments’ roles in peacebuilding and democratic governance and consider effective ways to support parliaments in post-conflict and fragile states.
Dutta, N., et.al., 2007, ‘Strengthening Legislatures for Conflict Management in Fragile States’, Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
What role does the legislature play in conflict management in fragile states? How can its role be strengthened? This study from Princeton University, UNDP and USAID assesses the situation in Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uganda. It argues that the legislature can use its representative and deliberative capacities to become an effective institution for conflict management. Legislative strengthening should focus on three areas: building compromises within the legislature; overcoming executive-legislature imbalance; and strengthening linkages between constituents and the legislature through effective communication and representation.
Access full text: available online
UNDP, 2007, ‘Parliaments, Crisis Prevention and Recovery, Guidelines for the International Community’, UNDP, New York
What is the role of parliaments in peacebuilding and crisis management? How can the international community best support them? These guidelines from the United Nations Development Programme suggest that assistance by external actors underestimates the productive role that parliamentary institutions can play. The formulation of peacebuilding strategies and power-sharing arrangements should consider impacts on democratic governance development. Electoral assistance must be backed by investments in long-term parliamentary strengthening in order to achieve human development and to avoid public disillusionment with the democratic process.
Access full text: available online
Useful websites
- AGORA is a reference and knowledge hub for parliamentary development
- The World Bank Institute has a Parliamentary Strengthening Programme.
- UNDP has developed a wide range of resources on parliamentary development.
- The National Democratic Institute (NDI) has a broad range of programmes to strengthen emerging democratic legislatures around the world. Information and resources are available from their website.
- The Parliamentary Centre is a Canadian non-profit organisation that aims to improve the effectiveness of representative assemblies around the world.
- Commonwealth Parliamentary Association
- European Parliamentarians with Africa (AWEPA)
- SADC Parliamentary Forum is chartered to bring about convergence of economic, political, and social values in the SADC and help create the appropriate environment for deeper regional cooperation through popular participation.
- The Inter-Parliamentary Union aims to be a focal point for world-wide parliamentary dialogue and works for peace and co-operation among peoples and for the firm establishment of representative democracy.