GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Alliances Against Poverty: DFID’s Experience in Peru 2000-2005

Alliances Against Poverty: DFID’s Experience in Peru 2000-2005

Library
M Lewis, R Eyben, J Crabtree, F Wilson, F Sagasti, C Csaky
2005

Summary

Addressing the underlying causes of inequality and exclusion requires donors to engage with political processes. Alliances involving state and society must be strengthened and donors must play an active role in them. This report from the Department of International Development (DFID) reviews the application of rights-based approaches through the concept of active citizenship in a middle-income country context, drawing on the Peruvian experience. For the first time it tackles questions of legitimacy, potential and accountability of donor engagement from a donor’s perspective.

The success of rights-based approaches depends on a combination of factors such as an enabling context and a willingness on the donor’s side to take opportunities for action as they emerge. Also, supporting state and society, both separately as well as in a co-ordinated manner, requires acknowledging the political nature of development. Questions regarding the legitimacy, potential and accountability of donor engagement are raised. Although there are no easy answers, DFID’s experience in Peru suggests that this approach can be a driving force for social change. It successfully combines the strengthening of participatory democracy at the local level and representative democracy at the national level. This is a risky position for a donor to take and one that very few are willing or able to adopt.

It is early to judge the overall impact of DFID’s strategy in Peru, but the experience so far suggests that there are various lessons to be learned from it:

  • Staff expertise and a clear understanding of local political processes and of the conceptual debate surrounding donor involvement in them, can enable the development of a sound country strategy.
  • Reflective learning linking the rights and citizenship theory with a comprehensive strategy oriented to strengthening state-society relations can promote deep changes with limited resources.
  • Active involvement with all stakeholders can make formal democratic institutions more politically inclusive and committed to tackling poverty.
  • Reform, in particular changes in political culture, take time. Local and national level actors need to be involved.
  • Political parties are key actors that must become more responsive to wider society. Political will and citizen involvement are essential to facilitate change in this sphere.

Although DFID has withdrawn from Peru the lessons learned there remain relevant for donors working in this specific context or in other middle-income countries. Key policy implications are that donors need to:

  • Co-ordinate efforts behind a common agenda developed jointly with the local state, addressing issues of citizenship, rights and accountability.

  • Recruit high quality national staff and adopt a historical view on development to improve understanding of local issues and the adequateness of their policies.
  • Work systematically and openly with both state and society, and on relations between the two, to allow for a richer approach to development.
  • Support and participate in alliances to bring about pro-poor change as part of a strategy with political underpinnings. This in turn requires donors to become accountable both to the local state and society.

Source

Lewis, M.,Eyben, R., Crabtree, J., Wilson, F., Sagasti., F and Csaky C. (ed.), 2005, Alliances Against Poverty: DFID’s Experience in Peru 2000-2005, Department for International Development (DFID), London

Related Content

Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief
Helpdesk Report
2021
Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Impact of COVID-19 on Child Labour in South Asia
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".