GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Applying Conflict Sensitivity at Project and Programme Level

Applying Conflict Sensitivity at Project and Programme Level

Library
International Alert
2004

Summary

How does designing and implementing projects and programmes in areas of existing or threatened conflict differ from more straightforward development contexts? This chapter of a manual by a consortium of six organisations including International Alert provides tools for incorporating conflict-sensitivity into project and programme planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation (M&E).

Where aid is delivered in conditions of actual or latent violence even simple activities such as purchasing vehicles, training beneficiaries, and employing staff can have a damaging effect on establishing or building peace. It is essential to follow the principle of ‘do no harm’ and be aware of the causes of actual or potential conflict, the likelihood and severity of further conflict, and the capacity to work with partners to reduce conflict. Conflict sensitivity is needed at planning, implementation and M&E stages of the project/programme cycle in situations of existing or threatened conflict.

Key aspects of conflict sensitivity in the project/programme cycle are that it includes the additional elements of:

  • Conflict analysis at the planning stage. This ensures that interventions do not exacerbate violence but serve to build and consolidate peace.
  • Close scrutiny of the operational context at the implementation stage through regularly updating the conflict analysis, and adapting project/programme activities and processes accordingly.
  • Introducing an understanding of conflict actors, profile, causes and dynamics into the traditional M&E process. This identifies required adjustments to projects or programmes and ensures that the intervention has as positive an impact as possible on conflict dynamics. Conflict-sensitive M&E is in its early stages of development.
  • Conflict-sensitivity is needed at all points along the spectrum of conflict, from structural violence to violent conflict, regardless of whether the project or programme is for humanitarian aid, peace-building, or development.

Considerations in making projects and programmes conflict-sensitive include:

  • Incorporating conflict analysis into the assessment stage of project/programme design by linking it to a separate needs analysis or by integrating both into one tool. The first approach is easier to update and gives an in-depth conflict analysis. The integrated approach saves time and resources and makes project/programme design more inter-related.
  • Conflict analysis can be used to define an intervention, or to make a predefined intervention conflict-sensitive.
  • Key steps for conflict-sensitive planning are defining the objective, defining the process, developing indicators, linking the intervention to risk scenarios, preparing contingency plans and designing a conclusion/exit strategy.
  • Important elements of implementation are incorporating conflict-sensitivity into management, monitoring, and adjustment. Considerable flexibility is needed, and it may even be necessary to change fundamentals such as project/programme approach.
  • Issues of security and safety, trust, participation, transparency and accountability are prime considerations during implementation.
  • Key steps in M&E are deciding when to monitor or evaluate, designing the M&E process, collecting and analysing information, and recommending/redesigning. M&E is often difficult in conflict conditions, and there is not always a direct causal link between the intervention and its context.

Source

International Alert et al, 2004, 'Applying conflict sensitivity at project and programme level', in Conflict-Sensitive Approaches to Development, Humanitarian Assistance and Peacebuilding: A Resource Pack, International Alert et al, London, Ch.3.

Related Content

Interaction Between Food Prices and Political Instability
Helpdesk Report
2021
Gender, countering violent extremism and women, peace and security in Kenya
Helpdesk Report
2020
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Response on Violent Extremist Recruitment and Radicalisation
Helpdesk Report
2020
Automation of government processes
Helpdesk Report
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".