GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Multi-Hazards
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Professional development packs
    • Reports & literature reviews
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Our team
    • 25 years advancing evidence
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Building Inclusive Post-Conflict Governance: How the EU Can Support Women’s Political Participation

Building Inclusive Post-Conflict Governance: How the EU Can Support Women’s Political Participation

Library
Minna Lyytikäinen
2009

Summary

How can the EU and other donors support increased women’s political participation in post-conflict situations?  What can be done to ensure that this results in meaningful change for women in general?  This paper from the Initiative for Peacebuilding recommends practical strategies for the EU and other donors to guide the consideration of gender issues into their post-conflict governance interventions.

Gender roles can change considerably during armed conflict, and post-conflict reform of political institutions provides an important opportunity to increase women’s political voice and influence.  However, women’s rights organisations argue that a gender dimension is largely absent from the Paris Declaration and the new aid effectiveness architecture.  The EU and other donors must therefore make a conscious effort to support women’s rights.  At the same time, it is important to remain conscious that external development assistance can have complicated and ambiguous impacts on conflict, governance and gender dynamics.

The EU can help increase women’s participation in post-conflict politics in four ways:

  • Consolidating opportunities created by peace negotiations:  When peace negotiations begin it is nearly always men who participate, while women struggle to make their voices heard.  The EU should support women’s participation in both official and Track II diplomacy, through technical support and political pressure
  • Increasing women’s access to political spaces:  Economic dependence, low literacy levels, and traditional male dominance often inhibit women’s access to political spaces, as candidates, politicians, and voters.  Practical measures are proposed to help overcome this, including proportional representation, quotas, training for female politicians, and steps to increase women’s voting.
  • Promoting women’s voices in civil society:  International funding is vital for CSOs in conflict-affected countries, but women’s organisations must be locally led.  The EU can support such work by providing accessible funding for CSOs, including small women’s groups.
  • Promoting gender-sensitive policies: Female politicians may not necessarily advance the interests of women in general.  The EU can help ‘turn numbers into policy transformation’ through emphasising gender equality in policy discussions, capacity-building women’s agencies, promoting sex-disaggregated statistics and providing technical assistance.

The author proposes several specific actions, and a number of gender-sensitive indicators, in each of the four areas.  Key recommendations are that the EU should:

  • Promote political participation for women and gender-sensitive policy in its political dialogue with partner governments, to ensure women are better-represented in peace negotiations, and to ensure gender is on the policy agenda.
  • Provide technical assistance and resources to partner governments to support gender-sensitive design of electoral systems and development of policies and plans.
  • Support local CSOs, especially women’s groups, through accessible funding and capacity-building.
  • Mobilise the support of men at all levels.
  • Support research and data collection, including integration of gender indicators into M&E.
  • Ensure that a commitment to women’s participation is reflected in all the EU’s own policy, programming and practice.

Source

Lyytikäinen, M., 2009, 'Building Inclusive Post-Conflict Governance: How the EU Can Support Women's Political Participation', Initiative for Peacebuilding, International Alert, London

Related Content

Women and Girls' Political Empowerment
Helpdesk Report
2023
Conditionality and other approaches to secure women’s rights provisions in peace processes
Helpdesk Report
2020
Effectiveness of Donor Support to Women in Formal Political Leadership-Narrative Review
Helpdesk Report
2019
Effectiveness of Donor Support to Women in Formal Political Leadership - Executive Summary
Helpdesk Report
2018

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".