GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Evaluation of UNDP Contribution at the Regional Level to Development and Corporate Results

Evaluation of UNDP Contribution at the Regional Level to Development and Corporate Results

Library
UNDP
2010

Summary

This evaluation, conducted by the UNDP Evaluation Office, looks at the regional work of UNDP and assesses its contributions to the achievement of the objectives set out in the UNDP strategic plan (2008-2013). The scope of the evaluation includes UNDP regional programmes and the relevant institutional arrangements, especially the work of the regional service centres.

The evaluation examines UNDP contribution to development efforts in two broad areas: interventions that facilitate and strengthen cross-border initiatives on a range of common issues such as natural resources management, climate change, trade and migration; and ‘multi-country’ interventions that provide direct and often simultaneous assistance, usually on common issues, to a number of programme countries within a region or subregion. The evaluation also examines UNDP contribution at the regional level to corporate results, specifically how UNDP used its regional programme and regional presence to strengthen its own capacity, particularly at the country level, to contribute to development results.

The evaluation concluded that UNDP regional programmes have made significant and long-standing development contributions by promoting cooperation among countries in building regional and national institutions as well as addressing cross-border and common challenges. The regional service centres have, in particular, provided a useful space to anchor regional activities and provide technical support to country offices.

But it also concludes that in all regions, the contribution to results has been affected by fragmentation of regional programmes, insufficient linkages with national programmes, and time-frames that have not taken into account the need for long-term capacity development. While consultation on regional programming with partner countries and organizations does take place, the absence of a systematic framework for gauging demand and identifying opportunities constrains innovation and relevance. UNDP has not been able to adapt its own programming strategies to effectively enable countries to share development solutions across regions.

The core recommendation of the evaluation is that the organization should develop a strategic corporate business model that covers global, regional and country levels. The evaluation also recommends that UNDP should retain the system of regional service centres under the purview of the regional bureaus. Recommendations also cover the need to establish regionality criteria to help UNDP assess when a regional approach is appropriate; to strengthen consultation to ensure relevance to regional needs; to encourage cross-regional collaboration and use of regional knowledge corporately; and to maximize the use of regular resources allocated for regional programmes for interventions that contribute directly to development results rather than for internal corporate results.

Source

UNDP (2010). Evaluation of UNDP Contribution at the Regional Level to Development and Corporate Results. Evaluation Office, UNDP.

Related Content

Lessons from stabilisation, statebuilding, and development programming in South Sudan
Helpdesk Report
2020
Doing research in fragile contexts
Literature Review
2019
Designing, Implementing and Evaluating Public Works Programmes
Helpdesk Report
2018
Indicators and Methods for Assessing Entrepreneurship Training Programmes
Helpdesk Report
2018

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".