GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Good Practices in Supporting Supreme Audit Institutions

Good Practices in Supporting Supreme Audit Institutions

Library
OECD
2011

Summary

Supreme audit institutions (SAIs) are the lead public sector audit organisation in a country. Their main task is to examine whether public funds are spent economically, efficiently and effectively in compliance with existing rules and regulations. This guide focuses on how development partners can better support SAIs. But it can also be applied when considering how to better support sub-national audit institutions.

The guide highlights the need for development partners to build stronger links to SAIs and their key stakeholders so that they can understand better what is needed. Further key lessons are to:

  • Develop and support long-term capacity development projects for SAIs based on detailed assessments of political context and well developed strategic plans
  • Engage SAIs to audit development partner-supported projects – providing coaching and training support where needed
  • Advocate on behalf of SAIs with developing country governments, parliaments, civil society organisations and others – helping raise the profile of SAIs and encouraging use of their findings to achieve beneficial change in the use of public resources
  • Utilise the results of SAI audits in discussions with ministries of finance and spending ministries – particularly in key poverty alleviation areas such as education and health but also in ministries that impact on wealth creation such as public works and customs – to help ensure that an SAI’s work is used to achieve beneficial change.

It is important to recognise, however, that a developing country’s capacity in terms of supreme audit and oversight does not depend only on the institutional and individual capacities of the SAIs themselves. It also depends on the broader context as well as societal capacities as a whole, and the capacities of civil society, parliament, and the executive.

Source

OECD (2011). Good Practices in Supporting Supreme Audit Institutions. OECD-DAC. Paris: OECD Publishing

Related Content

Local financing for infrastructure in Zambia
Helpdesk Report
2017
Implementing Public Financial Management Reform
E-Learning
2017
Decentralisation of budgeting process
Literature Review
2017
Public procurement reform: assessing interventions aimed at improving transparency
Literature Review
2016

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".