GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»How, When and Why Does Poverty Get Budget Priority? Expenditure in Five African Countries

How, When and Why Does Poverty Get Budget Priority? Expenditure in Five African Countries

Library
M Foster, A Fozzard, F Naschold, T Conway
2002

Summary

It has become a part of the conventional wisdom of development policy that poverty reduction is one of the main development objectives. What are the key factors influencing the struggle to re-orient public expenditure towards the interests of the poor? This working paper from the Overseas Development Institute synthesises the key findings from case studies in five countries (Ghana, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania and Uganda), each of which examined how public expenditure management has been linked to poverty reduction policy goals.

Each of the case study countries experienced major transformations over the course of the 1990s. At the beginning of the 1990s, public expenditure in each of the five countries could be characterised as both regressive and inefficient, with government providing services of poor quality to a small proportion of the population, and the non-poor benefiting disproportionately. Budget systems at the beginning of the 1990s were essentially incremental in nature, based on across-the-board increases in budget allocations, plus investments in new activities largely driven by donor project aid. Governments were involved in more activities than they could adequately operate, maintain and manage.

Poverty reduction is impossible without reforming the whole system of public finances. Efficient and effective public expenditure management is an essential precondition for government to be able to do anything significant for poverty reduction. Other conclusions from the study are that:

  • Reasonable progress in reducing poverty requires a political leadership committed to this as a goal
  • Many of the problems of ineffective budget management that undermine the ability to re-orient spending towards the poor, stem from political reluctance to recognise the need for tough choices and for budget discipline
  • The commitment to poverty reduction in all the case study countries is fragile
  • The Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) process helps to reinforce the position of reformers wishing to enhance and preserve allocations important to the poor
  • The sharing of information and a pro-active approach to participation helps to improve the effectiveness of poverty policies
  • A good analysis of poverty issues positively influences poverty policies.

There is a pressing need to fundamentally change the pattern of public expenditure and the process by which this is determined, and to combine this with reforms which would improve the effectiveness of government spending in the sphere of poverty reduction. The policy implications from the paper are that:

  • The government has to integrate budgeting and planning functions in order to prioritise public expenditure needs
  • The government must ensure that actual expenditures reflect budget priorities
  • The government must improve the system of public administration including the management of scarce human resources, control of corruption, and the development of responsible administrative structures
  • Civil society organisations have to participate in decision-making and become so embedded that they become difficult to remove.

Source

Foster, M., Fozzard, A., Naschold, F. and Conway, T. 2002, 'How, When and Why Does Poverty Get Budget Priority? Expenditure in Five African Countries', Working Paper 168, Overseas Development Institute, London.

Related Content

Local financing for infrastructure in Zambia
Helpdesk Report
2017
Implementing Public Financial Management Reform
E-Learning
2017
Decentralisation of budgeting process
Literature Review
2017
Public procurement reform: assessing interventions aimed at improving transparency
Literature Review
2016

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".