GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Humanitarian Guidance Note: Cash Transfer Programming

Humanitarian Guidance Note: Cash Transfer Programming

Library
DFID
2013

Summary

This Guidance Note provides DFID staff with an overview of key components of cash transfer programming (CTP) in emergencies, including operational conditions required to assess its feasibility & effectiveness.

There is a significant and growing body of experience demonstrating that cash-based interventions can act as an alternative or complement to in-kind assistance, although they still make up only a fraction of overall humanitarian assistance. Cash transfers are not a sector in their own right but a tool that can be used – when appropriate – to meet different objectives, including improved health and nutrition outcomes, as well as support to livelihoods. It has the potential to be cheaper, aid local recovery and help limit commodity-led responses, which can distort local economies. Humanitarian agencies are increasingly incorporating cash transfers within their disaster response tool-box to deliver multi-sector objectives, and respond to different types of emergencies including: seasonal disasters, protracted crises, rapid-onset disasters and slow-onset chronic disasters.

Factors to be considered when deciding on use of CTP include:

  • Intervention objective clearly identified and can be feasibly met using CTP
  • Needs can be met though the market with readily available commodities or services at the required quality, quantity and frequency for the given project duration
  • Cash is used in the operational context and beneficiaries are open to receiving CTP
  • Access to functioning, competitive and integrated markets or options to support market recovery are present
  • Agreement on targeting and safe receipt of resources, including analysis of local gender dynamics
  • Assessment and selection of cash delivery mechanisms (mobile operatives, financial institutions) against clear criteria including: security, cost and scale up capacity
  • Position of National and local Governments
  • Security risks of cash are compared to other approaches and it is determined that risks to beneficiaries, agencies and any third parties can be managed
  • Humanitarian Agency (and implementation partner) has sufficient organisational capacity & systems to deliver project – to involve logistics, finance and legal advice as needed
  • Inclusion of CTP within the coordination system (e.g. IASC cluster system and/or Government-led coordination mechanisms) – including knowledge of aggregate input/impact
  • Accountability, monitoring and evaluation systems in place to demonstrate continued appropriateness of the cash intervention and implementation methods used

Source

DFID (2013). Humanitarian Guidance Note: Cash Transfer Programming.

Related Content

Investment in Refugee Education
Helpdesk Report
2023
Humanitarian learning resource guide (2020 Update)
E-Learning
2020
Humanitarian Action (2020 Update)
E-Learning
2020
Coping mechanisms in South Sudan in relation to different types of shock
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".