GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Institutional Capacity Building for Conflict Sensitivity

Institutional Capacity Building for Conflict Sensitivity

Library
International Alert
2004

Summary

How can practitioners begin the process of mainstreaming conflict sensitivity into an organization? All practitioners at all levels are both impacted by, and can impact, the development of their institution’s capacity for conflict sensitivity. This chapter from a resource pack on conflict-sensitive approaches explores how to mainstream conflict sensitivity in a systemic way, using a six-step framework.

Institutional capacity for conflict sensitivity means the ability of an organisation to develop and use the sum of its human and organisational capital to minimise negative and maximise positive impacts on the conflict dynamics of the environment/s where it works. An organisation should aim to be conflict sensitive as it will increase the effectiveness of its programming by minimising the risks to actors involved and mitigating the risk of occurrence or escalation of violent conflict.

There are some very real institutional challenges that need to be addressed, even in the most capable organisations, if conflict sensitivity is to become a reality in terms of organisational strategy and operational practice. Five essential prerequisites include:

  • Institutional commitment: indispensable in making conflict sensitivity a reality; without support from the top, organisational change will not happen.
  • Willingness to make changes in organisational culture and institutional structures: such changes are likely to be needed if a conflict-sensitive approach is to take hold.
  • Support for capacity development: this is needed to keep and build momentum as a process for change in organisational culture and institutional structures starts to occur.
  • Conducive external relationships: these are needed in the implementing area and outside it.
  • Accountability mechanisms: which are needed to underpin and reward staff and teams who incorporate conflict sensitivity in their daily practice.

Building on the above five key aspects, an organisation can begin the process of mainstreaming conflict sensitivity including deciding whether a minimalist or a more comprehensive approach is required. The six steps are:

  • Assess your organisation’s institutional capacity for conflict sensitivity. There are various aspects of the make-up of any organization that will impact on its ability to behave in a conflict sensitive manner. Grouping these aspects under the prerequisites outlined above will help develop an understanding of the existing capacity and opportunities for conflict sensitivity.
  • How, if at all, do the different elements of the organisation’s capacity connect? Some aspects of conflict-sensitive capacity may be well developed and others less so. It is important to understand how these different aspects connect. Reflect on one’s own and others’ experiences.
  • Reflecting on why and how others’ experiences might or might not work for one’s own organization can provide useful insights.
  • In light of the results from the above step, identify the key opportunities and possible challenges. What are the key needs for institutional capacity building? Where do the key strategic and operational opportunities lie? How can these opportunities be realised?
  • Prioritise, develop and implement a plan of action. Once the analysis phase is over, it is important to link it to a plan of action.
  • Monitor and evaluate results and review plan of action. What impacts have the capacity building steps had on your organisation? What went well, less well and, most importantly, why?

Source

FEWER, International Alert and Saferworld, 2004, ?Institutional capacity building for conflict sensitivity,? Chapter 5 in Resource Pack on Conflict-Sensitive Approaches, FEWER, International Alert and Saferworld, London

Related Content

Interaction Between Food Prices and Political Instability
Helpdesk Report
2021
Gender, countering violent extremism and women, peace and security in Kenya
Helpdesk Report
2020
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Response on Violent Extremist Recruitment and Radicalisation
Helpdesk Report
2020
Automation of government processes
Helpdesk Report
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".