GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Justice Delayed in Malawi’s Criminal Justice System: Paralegals vs. Lawyers

Justice Delayed in Malawi’s Criminal Justice System: Paralegals vs. Lawyers

Library
Hillery Anderson
2006

Summary

The judicial system of Malawi is compromised because of archaic laws and systemic lack of legal representation for indigents. This paper, published by the International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, analyses Malawi’s criminal justice system and examines the use of paralegals to redress the lack of legal representation. Use of paralegals to assist poor people provides benefits for the poor and helps countries’ progress towards provision of fundamental human rights.

Justice for Malawi’s poor is woefully inadequate; the number of lawyers is very low, their fees are very high. The country’s Legal Aid Department attempts to help individuals pay their legal costs. However, since Legal Aid lacks adequate financial resources, most poor people undergo trial without legal representation.

In 1995, Penal Reform International (PRI) conducted an assessment of Malawi’s prisons. It concluded that poor people are over-represented in prisons; many prisoners are held unlawfully because of expired warrants. Suspects are held without trials and convicted prisoners are ignorant about appeal procedures. As a result of their findings, PRI lobbied successfully for funding of Malawi’s Paralegal Advisory Service to help indigent prisoners obtain legal assistance.

Advantages of the use of paralegals to help the poor including the following:

  • Lay workers who provide legal aid to prisoners free of charge.
  • Paralegal training includes introduction to the legal system, including the statutes, civil and criminal law, family, land and constitutional law, human rights and democracy
  • Paralegals inform suspects on the law, attend trials and monitor cases to protect prisoners’ rights. They assist juveniles at police stations with interviews and help screen juveniles for diversion programmes. 
  • Paralegals assist prisoners through the use of bail, case discharge, dismissal or release of prisoners on compassionate grounds. 
  • While paralegals encountered initial resistance from magistrates, police and lawyers and prison systems, they immediately tackled the need to work effectively with judicial parties. 
  • Paralegals have highlighted health problems within prisons which health-oriented non-government organisations are working to improve.

The use of paralegals has had the following impact on the inequality of the delivery of justice in Malawi:

  • All judicial services are now working together in an effort to improve legal services to the poor.
  • Case overloads have been reduced; prisoners are more aware of their human rights.
  • The numbers of illegal remand warrants used by police have decreased; Substantial numbers of juveniles in conflict with the law have been diverted from the judicial system.
  • Appropriate legal advice and assistance to the maximum number of qualified prisoners and juveniles is now being provided to poor people. 

Source

Anderson H., 2006, 'Justice Delayed in Malawi’s Criminal Justice System: Paralegals vs. Lawyers', International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences (IJCJS) Vol. 1

Related Content

Varieties of state capture
Working Papers
2023
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief
Helpdesk Report
2021
Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".