GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Non-Contributory Pensions and Poverty Prevention: A Comparative Study of Brazil and South Africa

Non-Contributory Pensions and Poverty Prevention: A Comparative Study of Brazil and South Africa

Library
HelpAge International
2003

Summary

What is the role of non-contributory pension programmes in reducing and preventing poverty and vulnerability among older people and their households in developing countries? This report from the Institute of Development Policy and Management and HelpAge International analyses non-contributory pension programmes in Brazil and South Africa, looking for evidence of their impact on well-being, participation and security. It concludes that extending such programmes to other developing countries could have a significant impact on reducing poverty and vulnerability among households with older people.

The debate on how best to organise old age support in developing countries is growing. Old age poverty is widespread in developing countries, and informal old age support is coming under increasing pressure from adverse economic conditions, migration, HIV/AIDS and changes in household composition. In the absence of policy interventions, older people and their households will continue to expand the ranks of the poor.

Pensions play a key role in old age support systems, but research and debate on pension policy has so far focused on contributory pension programmes. Non-contributory pension programmes, present in only a handful of developing countries, are more likely to have an impact upon poverty and vulnerability and facilitate economic development. Brazil and South Africa are the developing countries with the largest programmes.

  • Non-contributory pension programmes have a significant impact on poverty. In their absence, the poverty headcount and the poverty gap would be appreciably higher for households with older people. The programmes significantly reduce the probability that individuals in houses with a pension recipient will be in poverty.
  • In Brazil and South Africa, pension benefits are shared within households, and non-contributory pension benefits should be considered more appropriately as household cash transfers tagged on old people.
  • Non-contributory pension programmes reduce household vulnerability. Households with a non-contributory pension recipient show greater financial stability and lower probability of experiencing a decline in living standards.
  • Non-contributory pensions promote functionings (the beings and doings that people value) in older people. Preliminary analysis shows that pension recipients have a lower incidence of deprivations, especially in urban areas.
  • In Brazil and South Africa, non-contributory pension programmes reach a large number of poor older people at relatively low cost. The programmes are financially sustainable and attract a large measure of political support.

Extending non-contributory pension programmes to other countries could have a significant impact on reducing poverty and vulnerability among households with older people.

  • In low-income countries, with a limited tax base and a lack of an effective administrative structure, the introduction of such programmes will require international support.
  • Recent initiatives, such as the International Labour Organisation’s Global Social Trust, are beginning to focus attention on the nature of the international support needed.
  • Further work needs to be done to consider more specific issues of programme design, administration and financing in these countries.
  • It is unlikely that the Millennium Development Goals can be successfully achieved without urgent consideration being given to the establishment and extension of non-contributory pension programmes.

Source

HelpAge International and IDPM, 2003, ‘Non-Contributory Pensions and Poverty Prevention: A Comparative Study of Brazil and South Africa’, HelpAge International and Institute of Development Policy Management (IDPM), London and Manchester

Related Content

Affirmative action around the world Insights from a new dataset (update)
Working Papers
2023
Pathways to Increase Rural Women’s Agency Within Social Protection Programmes
Helpdesk Report
2023
Workplace-based Learning and Youth Employment in Africa
Literature Review
2020
Social protection
Topic Guide
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".