GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»Document Library»Social Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Regional Review

Social Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Regional Review

Library
Stephen Devereux, Rachel Cipryk
2009

Summary

How successfully is social protection being delivered in Africa? What challenges remain in the extension of social protection? This study explores how social protection strategies are being implemented by African governments, with support from bilateral and multilateral donors and international and local NGOs. The social protection debate in Africa now needs to move beyond social transfers to focus on social justice, including the mobilisation of civil society to claim entitlements and rights from the state.

The need for social protection is greater in sub-Saharan Africa than in any other region in terms of the depth of poverty and the range of vulnerability factors. Half of the continent’s population live in chronic poverty. The prevalence of undernourishment is twice as high in Africa as in the ‘developing world’ as a whole.

Social protection in Africa has conventionally been dominated by humanitarian relief and food-based ‘safety nets’. But the emerging social protection agenda in Africa is dominated by social assistance, specifically unconditional cash transfers. These have been used partly as an alternative to decades of emergency food aid that has had little impact on poverty or food insecurity. They have also been used in an attempt to galvanise moribund local economies through sustained injections of purchasing power.

Different African countries have responded in different ways to the social protection agenda:

  • In some countries, mostly in southern Africa, governments have introduced their own welfarist programmes, such as social pensions and support to families affected by HIV and AIDS.
  • In countries such as Ethiopia and Ghana, there is a genuine partnership between governments and donors in delivering social transfers.
  • Many governments remain sceptical about ‘handouts’ to poor citizens, preferring to invest scarce public resources directly in production, for example through agricultural input subsidies.
  • The social protection agenda is widely perceived as being donor-driven, with agencies supporting governments or funding international NGOs to deliver ‘social cash transfers’ to clusters of poor citizens.
  • While cash transfers dominate the social protection agenda in Africa, they are delivered as social assistance, not grounded in entitlement-based claims or citizenship rights.
  • In several African countries civil society is under-represented in domestic social protection debates.

What is needed now is a ‘transformative’ approach to social protection that focuses on rights and social justice. Transformative social protection implies mobilisation to claim entitlements and rights from the state, which involves working with local civil society organisations.

  • It is important to link the delivery of social protection to the delivery of basic services, especially education and health, social welfare and child protection services.
  • Specific aspects of social protection that require attention include community-based monitoring of service delivery and quality of services, building local accountability and good governance in service provision.
  • There is an urgent need to think through strategies for influencing government in contexts where civil society is weak or absent.
  • Shifting the social protection debate requires moving beyond social transfers, to transformative issues such as women’s reproductive health, housing, land rights and migrants’ rights to social protection.

Source

Devereux, S. and Cipryk, R., 2009, 'Social Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Regional Review', Institute of Development Studies, Brighton UK

Related Content

Affirmative action around the world Insights from a new dataset (update)
Working Papers
2023
Pathways to Increase Rural Women’s Agency Within Social Protection Programmes
Helpdesk Report
2023
Workplace-based Learning and Youth Employment in Africa
Literature Review
2020
Social protection
Topic Guide
2019

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".