• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»E-Learning»Covid-19, Conflict, and Governance Evidence Summary No.14

Covid-19, Conflict, and Governance Evidence Summary No.14

E-Learning
  • Weekly Evidence Summary
  • William Avis
August 2020

This weekly Covid-19, Conflict, and Governance Evidence Summary aim to signpost DFID and other UK government departments to the latest evidence and opinions on Covid-19 (C19), to inform and support their responses. This week, features resources on how policy responses to the C19 pandemic should differ in the Developing World; the state of the Asia-Pacific economy in the wake of C19, and the effect of the pandemic on global armed conflict.

Many of the core C19 themes continue to be covered this week, including leadership; authoritarianism versus democracy, and the effect of the C19 on conflict. The summary uses two main sections – (1) literature: – this includes policy papers, academic articles, and long-form articles that go deeper than the typical blog; and (2) blogs & news articles. It is the result of one day of work and is thus indicative but not comprehensive of all issues or publications.

Methodology

Due to the emerging nature of the Covid-19 crisis, this rapid weekly summary includes blogs, and news articles,
in addition to policy and academic literature. The sources included are found through separate searches of
Google and ReliefWeb with the keywords:

(“COVID-19” OR “coronavirus”) AND (“developing countries” OR “Africa” OR “Asia” OR “Middle East”
OR “Latin America” OR “Pacific”) AND (“conflict” OR “peace” OR “violence” OR “resilience” OR
“fragility”)

(“COVID-19” OR “coronavirus”) AND (“authoritarian*” OR “democra*” OR “corrupt*” OR “transparency”
OR “state legitimacy” OR “non-state actors” OR “state capacity” OR “state authority” OR “politic*” OR
“state institutions”)

Plus separate searches of Google Scholar with the keywords:

(“COVID-19” OR “coronavirus”) AND (“developing countries” OR “Africa” OR “Asia” OR “Middle East”
OR “Latin America” OR “Pacific”)

(“COVID-19” OR “coronavirus”) AND (“developing countries” OR “Africa” OR “Asia” OR “Middle East”
OR “Latin America” OR “Pacific”) AND (“conflict” OR “peace” OR “violence” OR “resilience” OR
“fragility”)

(“COVID-19” OR “coronavirus”) AND (“authoritarian*” OR “democra*” OR “corrupt*” OR “transparency”
OR “state legitimacy” OR “non-state actors” OR “state capacity” OR “state authority” OR “politic*” OR
“state institutions”)

The searches are restricted to articles published in the previous seven days, in English. This is complemented
by a focussed Twitter search (using just the pages of a small selection of research organisations, and key
scholars/thinkers, including those funded by the UK government’s Department for International Development
(DFID)), and through email recommendations from DFID advisors and leading experts. This is a trial and error
approach, which will be refined and changed over the coming weeks. If you have literature to include in the
weekly summary, please email – s.herbert@bham.ac.uk 

Thanks to Priscilla Baafi for research assistance support, and Professor Heather Marquette for expert advice.

Suggested citation

Avis, W. (2020). COVID-19 Conflict and Governance Evidence Summary No.14. K4D Evidence Summary. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies

About the author: William Avis

William joined GSDRC at the University of Birmingham in 2015 from the Overseas Development Institute. He spent four years with ODI in various research roles, most recently with the growth, poverty, and inequality team. Among his publications are The data revolution: finding the missing millions and Towards a better life? A cautionary tale of progress in Ahmedabad. William’s research interests include identity and conflict, globalisation and political voice. His Ph.D. examined constructions of Assamese identity in post-independence India (University of Sheffield).
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more