• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Assessing seismic risk in Ethiopia

Assessing seismic risk in Ethiopia

Helpdesk Report
  • Siân Herbert
January 2014

Question

Identify data on, or ways to assess, seismic risk in Ethiopia. Where possible, identify what the data suggests about the absolute levels of risk, the relative levels of risk compared to other countries, and which populations are particularly vulnerable.

Summary

There is limited literature available in this area. Abeye (2012) argues that an updated seismic hazard map of Africa is long overdue. In a case study analysis of the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa, a 1999 UNIDSR report identified as challenges an absence of previous seismic risk assessment, few specialists and limited practice in seismology and earthquake engineering, low awareness of earthquake disaster risk at the political level, and limited financial resources (UNIDSR, 1999, p.23).

Key findings include:

  • In terms of overall seismic risk, the presence of part of the East African Rift, which runs through the centre of the country, means that Ethiopia is prone to seismic activity and related natural disasters: earthquakes and volcanic eruptions (Abebe, 2010). As a landlocked country, it is not at risk from tsunamis.
  • The centre of Ethiopia faces a medium risk of earthquake hazard – more so than its neighbouring countries. Ethiopia has experienced a number of earthquakes. These have caused some deaths, and damage to buildings. According to the EM-DAT database, from 1900 to 2013 in Ethiopia this has caused a total of 93 deaths, 165 injured, 420 homeless, affecting 11,000 people, and a total estimated economic cost of more than US$7 million.
  • Ethiopia, and neighbouring countries, have a number of active volcanoes and Ethiopia has experienced some volcanic eruptions which have caused death and damage to buildings.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Coping mechanisms in South Sudan in relation to different types of shock
Helpdesk Report
2020
Social protection
Topic Guide
2019
Cost-Effectiveness in Humanitarian Aid and Development: Resilience Programming
Helpdesk Report
2018
Refugees in Uganda: (in)stability, conflict, and resilience
Conflict Analysis
2018
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more