• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Civil Service Reform in Rwanda

Civil Service Reform in Rwanda

Helpdesk Report
  • Emma Broadbent
December 2009

Question

Please collate the key literature on civil service reform and capacity development in the public sector in Rwanda in the past ten years, summarising the main debates, successes and current challenges.

Summary

It is generally asserted that the Government of Rwanda has embarked on an impressive array of public sector reforms, with little criticism of their commitment or political willingness to support change. Public sector reform is discussed in the following policy contexts: human resource development; good governance and institutional strengthening; decentralisation to district- and sub-district-level bodies; and public financial management.

A review of the literature suggests that there have been a number of successes in the public sector reform process. Key achievements are:

  • rapid downsizing and retrenchment implemented early on
  • comprehensive pay restructuring
  • better qualified and more competent public sector servants through capacity building.

Despite these achievements, the reform process still faces significant challenges in the following areas:

  • Staff capacity is crucially lacking in the following areas: information and communication technologies (ICT), accounting, and monitoring and evaluation (M&E).
  • There is a lack of sensitisation of staff about the reform process and what capacity building entails, which can result in resistance to the process.
  • Retrenchment has left the public sector workforce depleted and lacking in institutional memory.
  • Reform has been difficult to manage in the context of decentralisation and the adoption of a ‘one size fits all’ organisational structure has been problematic.
  • There has been insufficient coordination between Ministries, Departments and agencies, and insufficient clarification of a number of boundaries between different parts of government and their roles and responsibilities in reform.
  • There is lack of clarity about human resources and whether a Human Resource Policy exists.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Government Communication Capacity and Media Freedom
Helpdesk Report
2019
Strengthening the Financial Independence of Independent Media Organisations
Helpdesk Report
2018
Institutional partnerships and twinning between civil service organisations
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022