• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Institutional partnerships and twinning between civil service organisations

Institutional partnerships and twinning between civil service organisations

Helpdesk Report
  • Huma Haider
May 2018

Question

What findings can be drawn from a review of theory, practice and evidence in relation to developed country-developing country institutional partnerships/twinning between civil service organisations – focusing on capacity development and sectoral outcomes; institutional relationships and bilateral partnerships; and people-to-people links?

Summary

‘Twinning’ typically entails a form of formalised partnership between similar institutions in the North and South for an indefinite period (Jensen, 2007; Baud et al., 2010), with the aim of strengthening the capacity of partners in developing countries (Jones and Blunt, 1999; Ouchi, 2004). Institutional twinning inherently implies that the primary focus of the capacity development initiative is at the organisational level (above individuals), providing a possible strategic entry point for sector strengthening. This does not mean that there will be no work at the individual level, but that any such work will be part of a wider range of inputs and interventions (J.P. expert comments). Thus, donor agencies and other organisations may adopt a different mix of twinning activities, including: short- or long-term placement of experts, study tours and missions, systems development, advisory services, training events and workshops (Ouchi, 2004). More extensive cooperation also occurs, based on reciprocal relationships between entities, such as municipalities, aimed at forming broad development partnerships (Grupstra and van Eerdt, 2017).

This rapid review highlights findings on developed country-developing country (or North-South) twinnings/institutional partnerships between civil service organisations in the following three areas:

  • Achieving sustainable capacity development outcomes and contribution to broader sectoral objectives.
  • Building institutional relationships to strengthen the bilateral partnership to benefit both country’s national interest.
  • Enhancing people-to-people links to develop closer ties, collaboration and influence.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 430 KB]

Enquirer:

  • Australian Government (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade)

Suggested citation

Haider, H. (2018). Institutional partnerships and twinnings between civil service organisations. GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1428. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

Technical Assistance and Capacity Building in International Development
Helpdesk Report
2019
Public Sector Reform and Capacity Building in Small Island Developing States
Helpdesk Report
2019
Donor funded alliances promoting regional cooperation
Helpdesk Report
2017
Factors important to the establishment, renewal or rehabilitation of the civil service
Literature Review
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023