• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Community-driven development and indigenous, ethnic minority, and disability issues

Community-driven development and indigenous, ethnic minority, and disability issues

Helpdesk Report
  • Evie Browne
August 2014

Question

Which, if any, community driven development (CDD) programmes explicitly discuss or deal with indigenous or ethnic minority issues? Which, if any, CDD programmes explicitly discuss or deal with disability issues?

Summary

Few CDD programmes explicitly address minority issues. Many programmes target vulnerable groups such as women, youth, disabled, ethnic minorities, but as one group rather than distinguishing their differing needs. Few programmes are targeted specifically at vulnerable groups alone. Many programmes focus on reducing poverty and vulnerability, with the implicit assumption that this will automatically include vulnerable groups. The wider literature on CDD inclusion tends to look at elite capture of CDD processes, rather than social inclusion. As a result, minority populations are usually included via policies to encourage their participation in planning processes. There is very little evidence on CDD programmes’ impact and outcomes for minority groups.

It is possible to draw together a few commonalities throughout the programmes:

  • Language and communication are barriers to participation. Information should be disseminated in local languages and non-written forms. PWD may need information in Braille, audio or picture forms.
  • It is important to have facilitators drawn from the minority community.
  • Programmes need to have a specific focus on vulnerable groups. It is not sufficient to assume they will be included in community-wide projects.
  • CDD tends to benefit and be controlled by elites and leaders. Minority groups lack power and influence over these processes.
  • Personal relationships with powerful actors appears to be the most common method for minority groups to have their voices heard.
  • Minority groups are often quite well-included in community planning processes in terms of presence. However, they do not generally exert much real influence on sub-project choices.
  • Minority groups are mostly included in policies and planning documents, particularly in the World Bank early stage assessments.
  • Disability needs can be taken into account by ensuring infrastructure sub-projects are mobility accessible.
  • Some programmes track the number or per cent of minority groups attending meetings as an indicator of inclusion.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • Australian Government (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade)

Related Content

Impact of COVID-19 on Child Labour in South Asia
Helpdesk Report
2020
Situation of Persons with Disabilities in Lebanon
Helpdesk Report
2018
Disability in South Sudan
Helpdesk Report
2017
Youth initiatives supporting citizen engagement with government
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023