• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Comprehensive sexuality education

Comprehensive sexuality education

Helpdesk Report
  • Evie Browne
May 2015

Question

What evidence is there for comprehensive sexuality education in lower and middle income countries? What measurable outcomes have been associated with delivering CSE? What are the most effective strategies for implementation at scale? (e.g. in relation to gender, age, content, involvement of parents, political buy-in etc.) What challenges are there to applying such approaches in policy and practice?

Summary

Comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) has strong support in the international discourse, and is supported by a relatively robust evidence base.

In general, the evidence suggests that CSE has positive impacts on behaviour change, such as increased condom use, girls’ empowerment and delayed sexual debut. This is achieved through increasing knowledge and changing attitudes. There is strong evidence to support the effectiveness of CSE programmes in these areas. However, there is less evidence on whether CSE can change biological indicators, notably incidences of STIs, including HIV, and pregnancies. The literature highlights that this is an area of research which needs more conclusive findings. CSE is mostly implemented through the lens of preventing HIV/AIDS, and is mostly directed at adolescent girls, giving the evidence base a strongly gendered dimension. Most programmes take place in schools. Haberland (2015) provides strong evidence that content on gender and power in intimate relationships is a key characteristic of effective sexuality and HIV education.

The literature generally recommends holistic strategies for delivery which involve parents, teachers and peers as well as young people, and which link to broader factors such as accessible health services and social norms change. Effective programmes seem to use interactive, learner-centred and skills-based teaching approaches.

The key challenge to CSE identified in the literature is that of cultural resistance, which often takes the form of religious or morality-based conservatism. The main argument put forward is that teaching CSE encourages young people to have sex earlier and to engage in sexual activity. There is strong evidence to counteract this point of view.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 418 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Suggested citation

Browne, E. (2015). Comprehensive sexuality education (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1226). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

Gender and humanitarian issues
E-Learning
2015
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex rights in national human rights institutions
Helpdesk Report
2014
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) and Aid
Helpdesk Report
2011
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more