• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Disaster risk governance at national and sub-national levels

Disaster risk governance at national and sub-national levels

Helpdesk Report
  • Sumedh Rao
August 2013

Question

Identify literature on the governance of disaster risk in low- and middle-income countries, at national and sub-national levels. Please provide a summary of the literature along with an annotated bibliography.

Summary

Though the term disaster risk governance is rarely used, there is a large body of literature that relates to the governance of disaster risk in low- and middle-income countries with a focus on national or sub-national levels. This brief helpdesk research report identifies some of the most notable literature in this area and attempts to identify common conclusions.

‘Disaster risk governance’ can be defined as the way actors at all levels manage and reduce disaster and climate related risks (e.g. UNDP, 2013). Literature from closely related conceptual areas such as risk governance and disaster governance also provide insights into disaster risk governance.

A number of key points arise from the literature on disaster risk governance. From the general guidance literature notable points are:

  • There are certain key entry points for mainstreaming disaster risk governance. These include policy development, institutional development, advocacy and knowledge, supporting implementation of measures and supporting broad participation.
  • Development and disaster risk are closely related and impact each other in several ways. For example, development can lead to urbanisation which can present new disaster risks. Development initiatives should incorporate disaster risk considerations.
  • Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction/management are closely related, as would be the governance processes and mechanisms in these areas.
  • Disaster risk governance relates to many levels and actors. It involves the governance mechanisms and processes of national decision-makers, local communities as well as inter- and intra-governmental organisations.

From the literature focused on national level governance key points are:

  • Parliamentarians can and should play an important role in improving governance for disaster risk.
  • More guidance is needed that delineates responsibility between global, regional, national and local actors.
  • There are various monitoring mechanisms for identifying the degree of mainstreaming of disaster risk management in governance arrangements. Examples include tracking budgets for disaster risk and evaluating national policies, planning processes, and decision-making.

From the literature focused on local governance key points are:

  • Decentralisation and capacity-building of local governments, communities and networks is important to manage disaster risk.
  • Decentralisation, by itself, does not guarantee greater efficiency, social participation or accountability in relation to disaster risk management, but can create conditions conducive to these.
  • Political commitment from local and national actors is important to institutionalise effective disaster risk governance.

Finally, from the literature focused on institutional arrangements key points are:

  • A number of institutional arrangements affect disaster risk management decision-making. These include incentive structures, information gaps and intra-governmental relations.
  • Both formal and informal institutions help shape exposure, sensitivity and capacities of individuals, social groups and social-ecological systems to respond to disaster risk.
  • New legislation on disaster risk management can be a key enabler of disaster risk reduction and management.
  • Other governance reforms such as ‘New Public Management’ reforms can adversely impact disaster risk governance.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Coping mechanisms in South Sudan in relation to different types of shock
Helpdesk Report
2020
Social protection
Topic Guide
2019
Cost-Effectiveness in Humanitarian Aid and Development: Resilience Programming
Helpdesk Report
2018
Refugees in Uganda: (in)stability, conflict, and resilience
Conflict Analysis
2018
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more