• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Elected women’s effectiveness at representing women’s interests

Elected women’s effectiveness at representing women’s interests

Helpdesk Report
  • Evie Browne
May 2014

Question

What is the evidence on effectiveness of women elected in Africa in representing women’s interests once in power? What lessons are there on what can make them more responsive to their constituency/women in particular?

Summary

This rapid literature review collates evidence on women’s actions and interactions in parliaments in Africa. The literature mostly focuses on Rwanda, South Africa, Uganda and Tanzania (Bauer, 2012). There are several consistent findings from African countries, which enables drawing together key lessons:

Effectiveness at representing women’s interests:

  • The presence of women in parliaments has contributed to a more women-friendly atmosphere, and as a result it has become easier to raise gender issues in most countries.
  • Women report a change in attitudes of male MPs, and a shift towards acceptance of women in leadership positions.
  • There have been significant gains in gender equality legislation in several African countries; but on the whole, policies are not progressive.

Factors which influence effectiveness are:

  • Whether there is a women’s caucus or cross-party women’s representation. This facilitates discussing women’s issues in a positive environment.
  • Whether women are united on gender equality goals. Some women expressed solidarity with other women as their main driving force.
  • Whether party loyalty, or ethnic, religious, or cultural identity takes precedence over women’s representation.
  • Whether women are in senior positions of power and influence. Mostly women remain in the lower echelons of power.
  • Whether there is male support for issues. This can be critical to pass legislation.

Lessons on responsiveness:

  • Partnerships and relationships with civil society can help create a broad base of support. Many women have strong connections with the grassroots, which helps them represent their views in parliament.
  • Political systems can constrain women’s ability to be responsive to women constituencies. Some women are constrained by the need to follow party direction and cannot advocate for women’s rights.
  • Donors support women largely by funding capacity-building and training.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Sierra Leone

Related Content

Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2020
Faith-based organisations and current development debates
Helpdesk Report
2020
Responding to popular protests in the MENA region
Helpdesk Report
2020
Support for civil society engagement in peace processes
Helpdesk Report
2019
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more