• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Faith-based organisations, conflict resolution and anti-corruption

Faith-based organisations, conflict resolution and anti-corruption

Helpdesk Report
  • Evie Browne
August 2014

Question

What is the evidence on faith-based organisations' (FBOs) role in conflict resolution? What is the evidence on FBOs and corruption?

Summary

This rapid report reviews the literature on faith-based development organisations (FBOs) and their role in conflict resolution and anti-corruption. In both areas the literature suggests that religious actors could play a decisive role, but that this has not been realised.

The evidence on FBOs and conflict resolution is moderately robust. Nearly all literature provides case study examples, or interviews with NGO workers, but there is almost no comparative work and no comprehensive literature reviews or systematic reviews. Section 2 provides an overview of FBO attributes which contribute to conflict resolution, then presents examples of the roles FBOs have played, which include: Early warning; Emergency relief and support; Observers; Information and data collecting; Advocacy; Education and teaching; Convening dialogues; Mediation; and Healing. The report does not include examples of where FBOs have disrupted conflict resolution processes.

There is no body of evidence specifically on FBOs and corruption. There is some work on religion, religious values and corruption, but not on how faith-based development organisations work on corruption issues. Section 3 first reviews FBOs’ work on anti-corruption, then looks at corruption within FBOs.

The report concludes with a list of selected FBOs which are mentioned often in the literature.

 

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Infrastructure Project Failures in Colombia
Helpdesk Report
2018
PFM and corruption
E-Learning
2016
Webinar video: Public Financial Management
E-Learning
2015
State fragility and social cohesion
Helpdesk Report
2013
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023