• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting and gender indicators

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting and gender indicators

Helpdesk Report
  • Ann Kangas
August 2011

Question

What are the linkages between the practice of FGM/C and a) early marriage; and the four areas of DFID's gender vision, ie b) delaying first pregnancy, c) getting girls through secondary school, d) preventing violence against girls and women and e) getting economic assets to girls?

Summary

FGM/C is rooted in gender inequality and is used as a form of social control over women. While the practice and the decision of putting a girl through FGM/C may be taken by the girl’s mother or another female relative, there is a need to contextualise these decisions within societies that are strongly patriarchal. Underpinning early marriage, early pregnancy, lack of girls education, violence against women and girls and few economic assets are social norms that value men and boys above women and girls. It may therefore be more useful to look at FGM/C as an additional manifestation along the lines of the other indicators of social control, rather than to attempt to assess its correlation to each indicator individually.

The literature currently has little to say of the different links between these harmful practices. It does, suggest, however, that targeting the root causes of gender discrimination and changing the norms that control women and their sexuality, offers a chance for a broader change of other harmful traditional practices including FGM/C, child marriage, women’s lack of economic empowerment and other forms of gender based violence.

Although FGM/C has circulated on the international agenda for decades, gaps remain in the literature to fully understand this issue and the links between different harmful traditional practices. Further research is necessary to understand how social norms can effectively be changed.

 

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Key Drivers of Modern Slavery
Helpdesk Report
2020
Interventions to Reduce Forced Marriage
Helpdesk Report
2019
Preventing/Countering Violent Extremism Programming on Men, Women, Boys and Girls
Helpdesk Report
2019
Digital tools and changing behaviour in relation to violence against women
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more