• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»International aid to Lebanon

International aid to Lebanon

Helpdesk Report
  • Emilie Combaz
August 2013

Question

Please map international donor aid to Lebanon since the 2006 crisis, with a focus on the past two years. Where possible, identify recent funding committed in response to the Syrian crisis.

Summary

Key findings: Solid data from the OECD and OCHA makes mapping the official aid to Lebanon possible. However, official data is only part of the story: major aid flows have remained unrecorded, for example from Saudi Arabia and Iran. Information on macro-level aid also seems largely gender-blind.

Lebanon has received large volumes of international donor aid since the 1970s. The emphasis has regularly gone back and forth between, or at times combined, humanitarian assistance (emergency and recovery), reconstruction, or more traditional development.

Ideological, religious, political and economic interests have influenced the motivations and actions of all aid actors. Lebanon is the site of a development and reconstruction proxy conflict shaped by national and regional politics. This has translated into generally limited coordination.

Since the civil war, core players have mostly remained the same. Major bilateral donors have been Western states (especially the USA and some European countries), Western-allied Gulf countries such as Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, and Iran. UN humanitarian, refugee and development organisations have been consistently strong contributors. Likewise, NGOs and the Red Cross Red Crescent system have long been active, as have Lebanese actors themselves.

  • Between 2006 and 2011, EU institutions, the USA, UNRWA and France were consistently among the top 5 donors to Lebanon.
  • In 2011, by far the main sector funded was social infrastructure and services. Other significant sectors included ‘economic infrastructure and services’, humanitarian aid and production sectors. The most funded sub-sectors were education and ‘government and civil society’, followed by transport and storage, water supply and sanitation, and humanitarian aid.

As of 1 August 2013, close to 98% of humanitarian aid to Lebanon in 2013 has been related to the Syrian crisis (over US$ 427 million – out of the $1 billion deemed necessary). Top contributors include the USA, Kuwait and ECHO. Major channels are UNHCR, UNICEF, UNRWA and WFP, as well as the Red Cross Red Crescent system.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID MENA Department

Related Content

Responses to conflict, irregular migration, human trafficking and illicit flows along transnational pathways in West Africa
Conflict Analysis
2022
Interaction Between Food Prices and Political Instability
Helpdesk Report
2021
Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Gender and countering violent extremism (CVE) in the Kenya Mozambique region
Helpdesk Report
2020
birminghamids hcri

Contact Us Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023