• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Key actors, dynamics and issues of Libyan political economy

Key actors, dynamics and issues of Libyan political economy

Helpdesk Report
  • Emilie Combaz
April 2014

Question

Identify the key actors, power dynamics and issues of Libyan political economy after the Qadhafi regime.

Summary

The scene of actors in Libya is highly fragmented, localised and fluid. The main division seems to have been between forces that support continued changes (‘pro-revolution’) and others that do not (‘anti-revolution’).

  • Community actors:
    – Geographic communities. Beyond differences between Cyrenaica, Tripolitana and Fezzan, local communities have been the fundamental actors. Prominent ones have included Misrata, Zintan, Al Zawiyah, Benghazi, Bani Walid and Sirte.
    – Tribal groupings have alternatively generated conflict and conflict management.
    – Ethnicity (Arabs, Amazigh, Tuareg and Tubu) has at times been a part of conflict dynamics.
    – Further actors have included: urban notables; workplace or neighbourhood networks; and civil society as a whole.
  • Local armed groups have played the central role. The most powerful ones are the revolutionary brigades in the east and west. Other local armed groups include unregulated brigades, post-revolutionary brigades, and militias (including criminal networks and violent extremists).
  • Formal national politics has been a channel for elite struggles that stem from local interests and resources.
  • Many women and girls played major roles during the uprisings, but have been marginalised. A number of them have striven to remain active.

While some factors support peace, conflict has been dominant. Disputes have been rooted in longstanding competing claims over territory, public and private resources, power, justice and fairness. They stem from the interplay of: people’s different experiences, leading to divided views about the revolution; widespread insecurity and the mixed effects of security and conflict management through local actors; human rights abuses, impunity and weak justice institutions; inclusiveness and balance of power in formal politics; the distribution of licit and illicit economic and public resources (especially oil and gas); national identity and citizenship.

 

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID MENA Department

Related Content

Regional cooperation and political stability and prosperity
Donor funded alliances promoting regional cooperation
Helpdesk Report
2017
Factors affecting success or failure of political transitions
Helpdesk Report
2017
National climate change governance
Topic Guide
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more