• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Lessons Learned from Youth Employment Programmes in Kenya

Lessons Learned from Youth Employment Programmes in Kenya

Helpdesk Report
  • Zenobia Ismail
March 2018

Question

What has worked with regard to youth job creation programmes in Kenya? Give a summary and lessons from recent (2010 or later) donor/multilateral job programmes in Kenya.

Summary

The government of Kenya with the support of multilateral donors, especially the World Bank, has introduced several youth employment initiatives since the 2000s, including a large-scale public
works programme. There is a mix of supply-side programmes which provide training to enhance the skills of the youth labour force and demand-side initiatives which facilitate entrepreneurship
and provide business development services. Although the Kenyan economy is transforming slowly, there are structural impediments to creating higher productivity jobs (World Bank, 2016a)
especially for the youth. The literature calls for youth employment programmes to adopt a demand-side approach which stimulates job creation and encompasses support for labour-intensive industries which generate wage-employment as well as self-employment initiatives in agriculture and the informal sector (Fox & Kaul, 2017).

There is a paucity of rigorous evaluations of youth employment programmes in Kenya (World Bank, 2016), as well as very little information about the impact of agricultural support programmes which target the youth. This makes it difficult to reach a consensus regarding which types of youth employment interventions work best in Kenya. However, the limited evidence which is available from five evaluations of training and entrepreneurship development interventions in Kenya finds that:

  • The combination of life-skills training, vocational training and internships do lead to gains in employment and higher earnings.
  • Mentorship programmes for entrepreneurs do not yield sustainable benefits in terms of sales or profits.
  • The effectiveness of the Youth Enterprise Development Fund was hampered by inefficiency and corruption (Sikenyi, 2017).
  • cost-to-benefit analysis suggests that the cost of training can be off-set by improved earnings within one to three years after the intervention.

Youth employment programmes may struggle to achieve scale (World Bank, 2016b). There is a shortage of qualified trainers for entrepreneurship development and training providers may lack
the capacity to train large numbers of participants (Azevedo, Davis, & Charles, 2013). The impact of youth employment programmes in Kenya may be curtailed by factors which are beyond the
scope of the intervention such as the regional or ethnic marginalisation of some youth, especially in northern and coastal regions (Balwanz, 2012).

The World Bank recommends that all programmes be widely advertised so that there are a transparent selection process and a mechanism for addressing complaints. Other lessons include that youth enterprise development programmes should target youth from 18 to 35 years since older youth are more likely to create jobs for younger people (World Bank, 2016b). Overall, women in Kenya have fewer opportunities for access to education and skills development. Unemployment is especially high among female youth in urban areas (World Bank, 2016a). Youth employment programmes must be customised to meet the needs of young women. The available evidence suggests that women benefit from a combination of life-skills training, vocational training and workplace placements (Azevedo et al., 2013). Mentorship does not provide sustainable benefits for micro and small businesses run by women (Brooks, Donovan, & Johnson, 2016), although further research is needed to confirm this finding.

file type icon See Full Report [359.0KB]

Suggested citation

Ismail, Z. (2018). Lessons learned from youth employment programmes in Kenya. Birmingham UK: University of Birmingham

Related Content

Workplace-based Learning and Youth Employment in Africa
Literature Review
2020
Social protection
Topic Guide
2019
A Mapping of Larger Youth Employment Programmes in Developing Countries
Helpdesk Report
2018
Benefits of Internships for Interns and Host Organisations
Helpdesk Report
2018
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more