• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Micro levies for global public goods

Micro levies for global public goods

Helpdesk Report
  • Becky Carter
December 2015

Question

What experience is there of using micro levies to mobilise finance for global public goods? What scale of funding have these realised? What are the criteria that have shaped success/failure? What opportunities have been identified for micro levies to contribute to global public goods?

Summary

One type of innovative development finance is the micro levy, also referred to in donor literature as taxes, dues and solidarity levies for development. Donor proponents of this type of innovative finance for development make the case for linking new taxes on globalised activities (finance, travel etc) or global public bads (carbon emissions) to financing global public goods. Current examples include:

  • Solidarity levy on airline tickets – channelled to UNITAID to support the treatment and care for those affected by HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, focusing on low income countries.
  • Micro levies on oil, gas, gold and other mining activities – channelled to UNITLIFE to fight chronic malnutrition in sub-Saharan Africa.
  • French financial transactions tax – earmarked to French global climate and health activities.
  • Norwegian carbon tax – channelled to UNITAID.
  • Tax on Certified Emissions Reduction – channelled to the Adaptation Fund to finance climate change adaptation.

Key findings of the report include:

  • Assessments of micro levies find that they have added to public funds for development; however, these are not major fundraisers.
  • On the whole mechanisms such as the airline ticket solidarity levy are considered to have provided more stable and predictable revenue streams for international development than traditional donor budget outlays; but remain vulnerable to fluctuations in global economic or other conditions, and domestic political will.
  • There are well-publicised claims for the reach and development impact of initiatives such as the airline ticket tax, and in particular for the results of UNITAID.

The airline solidarity levy is often lauded as a significant pioneering example. Advocates urge the development of other micro levy proposals to finance other global public goods. Proposals include: aviation taxes; financial transaction taxes; a global currency transaction tax; a global carbon tax; and solidarity tobacco contributions. There has been slow progress on developing these further.

 

file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 833 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Suggested citation

Carter, B. (2015). Micro levies for public global goods (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1318). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

Donor Support for Climate Change Initiatives in the Middle East and North Africa
Helpdesk Report
2020
The Development Impact of Chinese Development Investments in Africa
Literature Review
2020
Lessons for coherent and integrated conflict analysis from multilateral actors
Helpdesk Report
2020
Aid and non-state armed groups
Helpdesk Report
2020
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more